Predischarge Bundle to Minimize Negative Impact on Quality of Life of Nuisance Bleedings (BATMAN)

May 1, 2018 updated by: Gianluca Campo, University Hospital of Ferrara

Predischarge Bundle for Patients in Dual Antiplatelet Therapy to Minimize the Negative Impact of Nuisance Bleedings on Quality of Life: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

A single-center, randomized trial of admitted patients with ischemic heart disease receiving percutaneous coronary intervention and stent implantation will be conducted at University Hospital of Ferrara. Patients will be randomized to either the control (standard care) or the bundle group in which patients will receive counseling regarding dual antiplatelet therapy management, advantages and side effects, screening for depression or anxiety, standardized education. The primary endpoint will be the difference in the quality of life as assessed by EQ-5D questionnaire.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Recent studies suggest that bleeding complications have a strong influence on quality of life. During DAPT regimen bleeding complications occur from 5% to 15% of patients. Nuisance bleedings (BARC 1 bleeding) occur more frequently and show a strong influence on quality of life, depression, anxiety and compliance to the treatment.

The aim of the study is to establish if a specific counseling programme might minimize the negative quality of life impact of nuisance bleedings. A computer-generated list will be used to randomize patients in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by age, sex, renal failure and P2Y12 inhibitor, to either the bundle or the control group.

All patients randomized to the control group (standard of care) will receive education from physician regarding dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) as part of the routine discharge process.

All patients randomized to the bundle group will receive:

i) a 15-min visit by a member of the research team 24 h prior to the anticipated discharge day. During this visit, a core set of DAPT risks will be addressed. Advantages and side effects of DAPT will be described. The importance of compliance will be discussed. The correct management of side effects (especially BARC 1 bleedings) will be discussed.

ii) a 15-min visit by a member of the research team with a family member living near/with the patient. Advantages and side effects of DAPT will be described. The importance of compliance will be discussed. The correct management of side effects (especially BARC 1 bleedings) will be discussed.

iii) brochure describing advantages, side effects and management of dual antiplatelet therapy. Contemporaneously, the investigators of the study will contact directly by phone and/or mail the general practionnaire of the patient to describe and explain the same topics and the clinical problem of her patient.

iv) availability of phone number to discuss potential side effects of DAPT. In addition, the study coordinator of the study will contact two times by month the patient by phone to assess DAPT compliance and potential BARC 1 bleedings.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
448

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • Ferrara
      • Cona, Ferrara, Italy, 44124
        • University Hospital Of Ferrara

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • signed written informed consent
  • hospital admission for ischemic heart disease with clinical indication to coronary artery angiography
  • percutaneous coronary intervention and drug eluting stent implantation
  • indication to dual antiplatelet therapy for at least 6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • oral anticoagulant therapy
  • bleeding event in the 30 days before the enrolment
  • planned surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: good clinical practice
all patients will receive education from physician regarding management of dual antiplatelet therapy as part of the routine discharge process
Behavioral: good clinical practice
education from physician regarding dual antiplatelet therapy as part of the routine discharge process
Other Names:
  • standard of care
Experimental: bundle group
patients assigned to the bundle group will receive visits and materials as described by the protocol (counseling)
Behavioral: bundle group
visits and materials describing advantages and side effects of dual antiplatelet therapy and their management
Other Names:
  • counseling regarding dual antiplatelet therapy management

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
quality of life
Time Frame: 1 month
quality of life assessment in each patient by EQ-5D questionnaire
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
emergency room admission
Time Frame: 1 month
number of access to emergency room service for bleeding
1 month
general practitioner visit
Time Frame: 1 month
number of access to general practitioner for bleeding
1 month
dyspnea occurrence
Time Frame: 1 month
number of patients suffering dyspnoea stratified according P2Y12 inhibitors
1 month
bleeding academic research consortium (BARC) 2-3
Time Frame: 1 month
occurrence of BARC 2-3 complications
1 month
bleeding academic research consortium (BARC) 1
Time Frame: 1 month
occurrence of BARC 1 complications
1 month

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ischemic adverse events
Time Frame: 1 year
cumulative incidence of the following ischemic adverse events: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack/stroke
1 year
all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 1 year
occurrence of all-cause death
1 year
BARC 1-3
Time Frame: 1 year
occurrence of BARC1-3 complications
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital of Ferrara

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 17, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 18, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 1, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 150595

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings