Efficacy of Cognitive Training in Subjective Memory Impairment
A Prospective, Three-arm, Parallel Design, Controlled Trial to Assess Efficacy of Cognitive Training in Subjective Memory Impairment
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
- Jae-Hong Lee
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects who showed normal range (above 16percentile of norm) in all domains of detailed neuropsychological tests battery named Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB)
- Clinical dementia rating (CDR) score of 0
- Subjects with at least 3 years of formal education
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects with mild cognitive impairment or dementia
- Subjects who was diagnosed as any neurological disorders such as epilepsy, stroke, hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, Parkinson's disease or brain tumor
- Subjects with uncontrolled severe medical conditions according to investigator's opinion
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: cognitive training
Cognitive training programs 2 times a week for 3 months (totally 24 sessions) for 90 minutes per session.
Lifestyle modification is educated first, then weekly phone call for lifestyle modification is done by investigators.
|
cognitive training is held 2 times a week for 3 months, 90 minutes per 1 session.
It includes cognitive exercise of multiple cognitive domains such as memory, attention, calculation, executive function and visuospatial function.
education about lifestyle modification is done by investigators at the first day of the trial and the investigators conduct weekly phone call to participants to educate the lifestyle modifications
|
|
Active Comparator: lifestyle modification
This group receives only lifestyle modification for 3 months.
Lifestyle modification is educated at the first, then weekly phone call for lifestyle modification is done by investigators.
The method of lifestyle modification is same with the first arm.
|
education about lifestyle modification is done by investigators at the first day of the trial and the investigators conduct weekly phone call to participants to educate the lifestyle modifications
|
|
No Intervention: No intervention
This group receives no intervention.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Paired associates learning test
Time Frame: 3 month
|
paired associates learning test is a part of computerized neuropsychological tests battery named CANTAB (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery).
The scores are shown as total number of errors.
|
3 month
|
|
Rapid visual information processing test
Time Frame: 3 month
|
rapid visual information processing is a part of computerized neuropsychological test battery named CANTAB.
The score is shown as correct response rate.%
|
3 month
|
|
Pattern recognition memory test
Time Frame: 3 month
|
paired associates learning test is a part of computerized neuropsychological tests battery named CANTAB (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery).
The score is shown as correct response rate.%
|
3 month
|
|
Spatial working memory test
Time Frame: 3 month
|
paired associates learning test is a part of computerized neuropsychological tests battery named CANTAB (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery).
The scores are shown as total number of errors.
|
3 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
cognitive failure questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 month
|
questionnaire for measuring self reported cognitive status.
score range: 0-100.
Higher score means worse cognitive status.
|
3 month
|
|
Mini-mental state examination
Time Frame: 3 month
|
mini-mental state examination that examines general cognition.
range 0-20.
Higher score means better cognition.
|
3 month
|
|
Geriatric depression scale
Time Frame: 3 month
|
questionnaire for depression measuring.
score range:0-15.
lower score means less depression.
|
3 month
|
|
Beck anxiety index
Time Frame: 3 month
|
questionnaire for self reporting anxiety measuring.
range:0-63.
low score means less anxiety.
|
3 month
|
|
Seoul instrumental activities of daily living
Time Frame: 3 month
|
scale for measuring activities of daily living limitation.
score range 0-45.
low score means better ability.
|
3 month
|
|
Rey complex figure copy test
Time Frame: 3 month
|
test for visuospatial function.
Participants should copy the complex figure.
score range: 0-36.
Higher score means better visuospatial function.
|
3 month
|
|
Digit symbol test
Time Frame: 3 month
|
a test for attention and psychomotor speed.
Participants are instructed to write an appropriately matched code for each number.
Correct number is counted.
score range: 0-76.
Higher score means better function.
|
3 month
|
|
Seoul verbal learning test, immediate recall
Time Frame: 3 month
|
measuring tool for immediate memory function.
Investigators read 12 words to participants.
Participants should remember the words.
Tests are done 3 times.
score range: 0-36.
Higher score means better immediate memory function
|
3 month
|
|
Seoul verbal learning test, delayed recall
Time Frame: 3 month
|
measuring tool for 20 minutes delayed memory function.
After 20 minutes from the immediate recall test, participants should remember the words.
score range: 0-12.
Higher score means better delayed memory function
|
3 month
|
|
Seoul verbal learning test, delayed recall
Time Frame: 3 month
|
measuring tool for cued recall of verbal memory function.
score range: 0-24.
2. Higher score means better memory recognition function
|
3 month
|
|
Logical memory test, delayed recall
Time Frame: 3 month
|
logical memory test is a part of a neuropsychological test named Wechsler
|
3 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jae-Hong Lee, MD,PhD, Asan Medical Center
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- YJeongHong
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.