Comparison of Different Methods of Enamel Preparation Before Pit and Fissure Sealants
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Nice, France, 06000
- CHU
-
Paris, France, 75000
- APHP
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Affiliated with the Social Security
- Attendance at inspections
- Subject to high individual risk of caries
- Subjects with at least two pairs of molars and contralateral counterparts with the initial lesions of enamel (pits and fissures colored) or suspected of dentine caries (not highlighted by two clinical and radiographic examination usual)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Molar inaccessible, closed, sealed, or decayed (reaching the dentine
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: dental bur versus air abrasion
1 tooth prepared with air abrasion versus one prepared tooth with dental bur
|
already used intervention to prepare micro cavities of the dental to be treated by a photopolymerizable resin
already used intervention to prepare micro cavities of the dental to be treated by a photopolymerizable resin
|
|
Other: sono abrasion versus dental bur
1 tooth prepared with sono abrasion ans 1 tooth prepared with dental bur
|
already used intervention to prepare micro cavities of the dental to be treated by a photopolymerizable resin
already used intervention to prepare micro cavities of the dental to be treated by a photopolymerizable resin
|
|
Other: air abrasion versus sono abrasion
1 tooth prepared with air abrasion versus 1 tooth prepared with sono abrasion
|
already used intervention to prepare micro cavities of the dental to be treated by a photopolymerizable resin
already used intervention to prepare micro cavities of the dental to be treated by a photopolymerizable resin
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
observation of quality of treatment
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Compare enamel preparation techniques of air abrasion and sound abrasion technique enameloplasty (pits and fissures extended to the dental bur) the more conventionally used to identify the most effective as using endpoint retention of material sealing of pits and fissures.
|
2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 08-PP-09
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.