Neoadjuvant Nab-PTX and Trastuzumab for ER Negative and HER2 Positive Breast Cancer

August 26, 2019 updated by: Satoru Tanaka, Osaka Medical College

Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Nab-paclitaxel (PTX) and Trastuzumab for ER Negative and HER2 Positive Breast Cancer

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nab-PTX and trastuzumab for ER negative and HER2 positive operable (tumor size of 3cm or less and N0) breast cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
    • Osaka
      • Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan, 5698686
        • Osaka Medical College

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer
  2. Tumor size of 3cm or less and N0
  3. Hormone receptors have been identified as negative
  4. HER2 positive confirmed by IHC 3+ or FISH+
  5. LVEF > 50% by echocardiogram or MUGA
  6. Adequate EKG
  7. No prior treatment for breast cancer
  8. PS 0-1
  9. Required baseline laboratory data WBC > 4,000/mm3 and Neut > 2,000/mm3 PLT > 100,000/mm3 Hb > 9.0g/dl AST and ALT < ULNx2.5 T-Bil < 1.5mg/dl Serum creatinin < 1.5mg/dl
  10. Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. With history of hypersensitivity reaction for important drug in this study
  2. With history of invasive breast cancer
  3. Bilateral invasive breast cancer
  4. Patients with medical conditions that renders them intolerant to primary chemotherapy and related treatment, including infection, diarrhea, intestinal paralysis, severe Diabetes Mellitus
  5. Positive for HBs antigen or HCV antibody
  6. With history of congestive heart failure, uncontrolled or symptomatic angina pectoris, arrhythmia or myocardial infarction, poorly controlled hypertension
  7. With severe edema
  8. With severe peripheral neuropathy
  9. With severe psychiatric disorder
  10. Pregnant or nursing women
  11. The case that is judged to be unsuitable for this study by physician

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: nab-paclitaxel plus trastuzumab
Four cycles of nab-PTX 260 mg/m2 with trastuzumab 6 mg/kg (8 mg/kg as the loading dose). One year of adjuvant trastuzumab will be administrated. Anthracycline regimens may be administered by physician's choice for the case expected to have a high risk of recurrence based on the pathological findings of surgical specimen. Adjuvant endocrine therapy may be administrated for the case with weakly hormone-sensitive (1-9% of positive cells) tumor.
Drug: nab-paclitaxel
nab-paclitaxel 260mg/m2 q3w
Other Names:
  • Abraxane
Drug: Trastuzumab
trastuzumab 6 mg/kg (8 mg/kg as the loading dose)
Other Names:
  • Herceptin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pathological complete response rate
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks after the protocol therapy
Up to 12 weeks after the protocol therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Disease free survival
Time Frame: Five years after the last patient enrolled
Five years after the last patient enrolled
Objective response rate
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks after the protocol therapy
Up to 6 weeks after the protocol therapy
Pathological response rate
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks after the protocol therapy
Up to 12 weeks after the protocol therapy
Breast-conserving surgery rate
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks after the protocol therapy
Up to 6 weeks after the protocol therapy
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks after the protocol therapy
Up to 6 weeks after the protocol therapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Osaka Medical College

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mitsuhiko Iwamoto, MD, PhD, Osaka Medical College

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 2, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 4, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 26, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • OMC BC-04 (Other Identifier: Osaka Medical College)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings