Stivarga Real Life Evidence in Hungary

February 9, 2018 updated by: Bayer

Effectiveness of Stivarga (Regorafenib) for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the Hungarian Real World Setting

The study aims to evaluate use of regorafenib in clinical practice in Hungary. The study should provide information about clinical characteristics of Hungarian regorafenib patients as well as information about safety and efficacy of regorafenib in Hungarian patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. This much needed data is required by the National Health Insurance Fund in order to accept regorafenib into the regular reimbursement system. This study is proposed to be based on patient data from the Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund's Database. Data to be analyzed includes patient demography and baseline tumor characteristics, overall survival, time to treatment failure, duration of treatment, average dose and dose modifications, and adverse events. Further, treatment costs will be estimated.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will be all patients who met the criteria within the SmPC. Using the National Health Insurance Database, patients will be included in this retrospective data analysis if they had at least one dose of regorafenib treatment cycle.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Using the National Health Insurance Database, patients will be included in this retrospective data analysis if they had at least one dose of regorafenib treatment cycle (=28 days).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not applicable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Cohort1/Regorafenib
All patients with at least 1 treatment with regorafenib
Drug: Regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506)
Product is used in accordance with SmPC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of treatment for each treatment episode
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis of 2 year period
The length of each treatment episode will be calculated based on the duration between the initiation date of a treatment episode and the end date of the same treatment episode
Retrospective analysis of 2 year period
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis of 2 year period
PFS will be defined as days between start of the therapy and the date of the medical doctors opinion about progression (confirmed by radiology or clinical assessment)
Retrospective analysis of 2 year period
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis of 2 year period
Retrospective analysis of 2 year period
Number of participants with treatment emergent adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis of 2 year period
Retrospective analysis of 2 year period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resource utilization per patient
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis of 2 year period
Costs per patient for the reimbursed healthcare service e.g. inpatient care, outpatient visit, emergency departement visit, pharmaceutical dispensing
Retrospective analysis of 2 year period

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to treatment failure (TTF)
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis of 2 year period
Time to treatment failure is defined as days between the first drug delivery to the health care provider and date of treatment discontinuation due to any reason, including death
Retrospective analysis of 2 year period
Time to progression (TTP)
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis of 2 year period
Time to progression is defined as days between the first drug delivery to the health care provider and the date of progression defined by the medical doctor
Retrospective analysis of 2 year period
Characteristics of patients with better response
Time Frame: Retropsective analysis of 2 year period
Patients with "better response" are defined as receiving more cycles of regorafenib treatment than the median number of cycles (2 cycles). Their distribution is analyzed by KRAS status, by the location of the primary tumour, by age, by prior cancer therapies and by location of metastases.
Retropsective analysis of 2 year period
Time frame between the baseline computed tomography and the first drug delivery
Time Frame: Retrospective analysis of 2 year period
Time frame between the date of the baseline computed tomography (CT) and the date of the first drug delivery to the health care provider
Retrospective analysis of 2 year period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bayer

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 15, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 15, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 21, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 13, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 12, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 9, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 18686

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings