Comparison Between Bronchoscopy and Real- Time Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Tracheostomy
Comparison Between Bronchoscopy and Real- Time Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy for Safety, Complications and Efficiency in Critically Ill Patient
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Trial is a randomized study to compare between ultrasound guided percutaneous tracheostomy and bronchoscopy guided percutaneous tracheostomy.
Patients will be randomly assigned to be submitted to evaluate safety, complication rates, easy to perform , clinical outcomes and effectivity.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All intubated and mechanically ventilated patients indicated for a tracheostomy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with tracheal or neck abnormalities, soft tissue infection in the neck, neck surgery history, oxygenation problems , coagulation disorders or coagulation parameter changes and those requiring urgent or surgery patients unable to provide informed consent.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Ultrasound
Ultrasound guided percutaneous tracheostomy
|
Ultrasound guided percutaneous tracheostomy
|
|
Active Comparator: Bronchoscopy
Bronchoscopy guided percutaneous tracheostomy
|
Bronchoscopy guided percutaneous tracheostomy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
procedure failure of ultrasound to provide this anatomical information and ease of perform
Time Frame: During percutaneous tracheostomy an expected average time 20 minutes
|
occurence of a major complications: bleeding, subcutaneous emphysema, oesophageal perforation, number of applied needle interventions, procedure duration, cardiorespiratory arrest
|
During percutaneous tracheostomy an expected average time 20 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
procedure time
Time Frame: during percutaneous tracheostomy ( average expected time 20 minutes)
|
the procedure duration was taken as the time that elapsed from the placement of the needle to the placement of the tracheostomy cannula.
|
during percutaneous tracheostomy ( average expected time 20 minutes)
|
|
Pneumothorax
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
|
Pneumothorax due to the percutaneous tracheostomy detected by clinical examination during the procedure or chest x-ray after the procedure.
|
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
|
|
Tracheal posterior wall injury
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
|
Tracheal posterior wall injury as detected by bronchoscopy after the procedure
|
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
|
|
Accidental decannulation
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
|
Accidental decannulation after the procedure during Hospital stay
|
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
|
|
Cardiorespiratory arrest
Time Frame: during percutaneous tracheostomy an expected average of 20 minutes
|
Cardiorespiratory arrest due to percutaneous tracheostomy
|
during percutaneous tracheostomy an expected average of 20 minutes
|
|
Minor bleeding
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
|
Haemorrhage that could not be stopped by sponge wrapping the stoma after the procedure and/or blood coming with aspiration inside the tracheostomy tube was defined as minor bleeding
|
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
|
|
Major bleeding
Time Frame: During the procedure an expected average of 20 minutes
|
Continuous haemorrhage from the stoma and/or from the trachea with aspiration despite compresses was defined as a major haemorrhage.
|
During the procedure an expected average of 20 minutes
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Hypoxemia
Time Frame: During percutaneous tracheostomy an expected average of 20 minutes
|
Drop in peripheral oxygen saturation < 90% for more than 2 minutes as measured by pulse oximeter during the procedure
|
During percutaneous tracheostomy an expected average of 20 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Aykut Saritas, MD, Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital
- Study Chair: muhammed murat kurnaz, MD, Prof.Dr.A.İlhan Ozdemir State hospital Giresun
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ravi PR, Vijay MN. Real time ultrasound-guided percutaneous tracheostomy: Is it a better option than bronchoscopic guided percutaneous tracheostomy? Med J Armed Forces India. 2015 Apr;71(2):158-64. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2015.01.013. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
- Gobatto AL, Besen BA, Tierno PF, Mendes PV, Cadamuro F, Joelsons D, Melro L, Park M, Malbouisson LM. Comparison between ultrasound- and bronchoscopy-guided percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study. J Crit Care. 2015 Feb;30(1):220.e13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.09.011. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
- Flint AC, Midde R, Rao VA, Lasman TE, Ho PT. Bedside ultrasound screening for pretracheal vascular structures may minimize the risks of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Neurocrit Care. 2009 Dec;11(3):372-6. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9259-z. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2014-1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.