Continuous v Bolus Infusion of Cefazolin During Ventral Hernia Repair
Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Cefazolin Redosing Strategy for Surgical Prophylaxis. Bolus Dose vs Continuous Infusion
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age >18 years
- Elective open Ventral hernia repair in CDC class one (clean) cases
- Planned operative time greater than 4 Hours
- Planned routine administration of cefazolin for pre-op prophylaxis
- No history of MRSA
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients unable to give informed consent
- Allergy to cephalosporins
- Pre-existing documented infection or ostomy (class II-IV wounds)
- Received cefazolin within 24 hours before surgery
- Creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min
- Upstaging of wound class intra-op that results in the administration of additional antibiotics
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: SINGLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Bolus infusion of Cefazolin
Subjects undergoing a ventral hernia repair in this arm of the study will receive the surgical prophylactic, cefazolin, in a bolus infusion
|
Subjects in the bolus infusion arm of the study will receive bolus infusions of cefazolin throughout the surgical procedure
Other Names:
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Continuous Infusion of Cefazolin
Subjects undergoing a ventral hernia repair in this arm of the study will receive the surgical prophylactic, cefazolin, in a continuous infusion
|
Subjects in the continuous infusion arm of the study will receive a continuous infusion of the cefazolin throughout the surgical procedure
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in Area Under Curve (AUC) of Cefazolin plasma concentration and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in both treatment arms
Time Frame: First four hours
|
After blood sample collection is completed samples will be analyzed for plasma concentrations of cefazolin.
This concentration will be compared with the standard minimum inhibitory concentration of Cefazolin.
It is expected that the difference between AUC and MIC in the continuous infusion group will be higher than the bolus infusion group during the first four hours of surgery.
|
First four hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in AUC of plasma concentration between the two regimens for the entire duration of surgery
Time Frame: Duration of surgery
|
After blood sample collection is completed samples will be analyzed for plasma concentrations of cefazolin.
This concentration will be compared with the standard minimum inhibitory concentration of Cefazolin.
It is expected that the difference between AUC and MIC in the continuous infusion group will be higher than the bolus infusion group for the entire duration of surgery.
|
Duration of surgery
|
|
Total dose of cefazolin administered during the surgery
Time Frame: Duration of surgery
|
Duration of surgery
|
|
|
Total dose of cefazolin administered during the first 24 hours
Time Frame: 24 hours after the beginning of surgery
|
24 hours after the beginning of surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kunal Karamchandani, MD, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- MILES AA, MILES EM, BURKE J. The value and duration of defence reactions of the skin to the primary lodgement of bacteria. Br J Exp Pathol. 1957 Feb;38(1):79-96. No abstract available.
- Lee FM, Trevino S, Kent-Street E, Sreeramoju P. Antimicrobial prophylaxis may not be the answer: Surgical site infections among patients receiving care per recommended guidelines. Am J Infect Control. 2013 Sep;41(9):799-802. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.11.021. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
- Hawn MT, Vick CC, Richman J, Holman W, Deierhoi RJ, Graham LA, Henderson WG, Itani KM. Surgical site infection prevention: time to move beyond the surgical care improvement program. Ann Surg. 2011 Sep;254(3):494-9; discussion 499-501. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822c6929.
- Stulberg JJ, Delaney CP, Neuhauser DV, Aron DC, Fu P, Koroukian SM. Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections. JAMA. 2010 Jun 23;303(24):2479-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.841.
- Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, Perl TM, Auwaerter PG, Bolon MK, Fish DN, Napolitano LM, Sawyer RG, Slain D, Steinberg JP, Weinstein RA; American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP); Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA); Surgical Infection Society (SIS); Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2013 Feb;14(1):73-156. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.9999. Epub 2013 Mar 5. No abstract available.
- Adembri C, Ristori R, Chelazzi C, Arrigucci S, Cassetta MI, De Gaudio AR, Novelli A. Cefazolin bolus and continuous administration for elective cardiac surgery: improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Aug;140(2):471-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.038. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
- Trent Magruder J, Grimm JC, Dungan SP, Shah AS, Crow JR, Shoulders BR, Lester L, Barodka V. Continuous Intraoperative Cefazolin Infusion May Reduce Surgical Site Infections During Cardiac Surgical Procedures: A Propensity-Matched Analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Dec;29(6):1582-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.03.026. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
- Ferraz AA, Siqueira LT, Campos JM, Araujo GC, Martins Filho ED, Ferraz EM. ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN BARIATRIC SURGERY: a continuous infusion of cefazolin versus ampicillin/sulbactam and ertapenem. Arq Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr-Jun;52(2):83-7. doi: 10.1590/S0004-28032015000200002.
- Finan KR, Vick CC, Kiefe CI, Neumayer L, Hawn MT. Predictors of wound infection in ventral hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2005 Nov;190(5):676-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.041.
- Dunne JR, Malone DL, Tracy JK, Napolitano LM. Abdominal wall hernias: risk factors for infection and resource utilization. J Surg Res. 2003 May 1;111(1):78-84. doi: 10.1016/s0022-4804(03)00077-5.
- Houck JP, Rypins EB, Sarfeh IJ, Juler GL, Shimoda KJ. Repair of incisional hernia. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989 Nov;169(5):397-9.
- Kaafarani HM, Kaufman D, Reda D, Itani KM. Predictors of surgical site infection in laparoscopic and open ventral incisional herniorrhaphy. J Surg Res. 2010 Oct;163(2):229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.03.019. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
- Blatnik JA, Krpata DM, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ. Does a history of wound infection predict postoperative surgical site infection after ventral hernia repair? Am J Surg. 2012 Mar;203(3):370-4; discussion 374. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.12.001.
- Buijk SE, Gyssens IC, Mouton JW, Metselaar HJ, Groenland TH, Verbrugh HA, Bruining HA. Perioperative pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime in serum and bile during continuous and intermittent infusion in liver transplant patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Jul;54(1):199-205. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh268. Epub 2004 Jun 2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ANTICIPATED)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00003845
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.