A Clinical Trial Comparing Isolite® vs. Cotton Roll Isolation in the Placement of Dental Sealants
A Clinical Trial Comparing Isolite® vs Cotton Roll Isolation in the Placement of Dental Sealants
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Iowa
-
Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
- University of Iowa College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy patients: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II
- Good cooperation: Frank1 3 or 4
- Aged between 6-16 years old at the day of sealant placement
- Minimum of two, maximum of sixteen, matched contralateral permanent molars or premolars.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Teeth with a history of past or current caries
- Teeth with a linical presentation of fluorosis, hypoplasia or any developmental anomalies
- Teeth with clinical or radiographic evidence of pathology
- Teeth with a history of restoration or sealant
- Patients who are poorly behaved
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Isolite System
The Isolite technique utilizes a flexible plastic dental adapter to separate the cheek and tongue prior to sealant placement.
|
|
|
Other: Cotton Roll technique
A cotton roll is placed between the cheek and tongue prior to sealant placement.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sealant Retention Percentage at 12 Months After Treatment
Time Frame: 12 months after treatment
|
Physical examination will be done in order to determine if there is a percentage difference in retention rate of teeth, specifically 12 months after treatment.
|
12 months after treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Shin, Director of Clinical Research
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 201502801
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.