Marginal Fit of Porcelain Veneers After Finishing Prepared Surfaces With Ultrasonic Tips
A Double-blind Split-mouth Randomized Clinical Trail Evaluating Marginal Fit of Porcelain Laminate Veneers Following Finishing the Prepared Surfaces With Ultrasonic Tips Compared to the Conventional Way
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic, DM20AM18
- Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Damsacus
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- aesthetic requirement with no cracks and congenital loss of any incisors.
- discolored teeth not responding to bleaching.
Exclusion Criteria:
- evidence proximal caries ,
- edge to edge occlusion
- parafunctional habits
- root canal treated teeth.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Ultrasonic tips
Prepared surfaces will be finished with ultrasonic tips
|
These tips are going to be used to give the final shape of the prepared surfaces before taking the impression for the construction of the veneers.
|
|
NO_INTERVENTION: Conventional
Prepared surfaces will be finished with ordinary burs
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Thickness of the light silicone layer encompassed between the abutment and the veneer
Time Frame: measurement will be made immediately (in the same day) of applying the constructed veneers onto the prepared dental surfaces
|
A light silicone material is going to be used to allow for measuring any gaps beneath the veneers.
The measurement will be in micrometer using a microscope.
|
measurement will be made immediately (in the same day) of applying the constructed veneers onto the prepared dental surfaces
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Anas Abdo, DDS, MSc student in Prosthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School
- Study Director: Mirza Allaf, DDS MSc PhD, Associate Professor of Prosthodontics
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ayad MF. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations. J Prosthodont. 2009 Feb;18(2):145-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00398.x. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
- Ayad MF, Johnston WM, Rosenstiel SF. Influence of dental rotary instruments on the roughness and wettability of human dentin surfaces. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Aug;102(2):81-8. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60114-1.
- Christensen RP, Ploeger BJ. A clinical comparison of zirconia, metal and alumina fixed-prosthesis frameworks veneered with layered or pressed ceramic: a three-year report. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Nov;141(11):1317-29. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0076.
- Eick JD, Johnson LN, Fromer JR, Good RJ, Neumann AW. Surface topography: its influence on wetting and adhesion in a dental adhesive system. J Dent Res. 1972 May-Jun;51(3):780-8. doi: 10.1177/00220345720510031401. No abstract available.
- Finger WJ, Manabe A, Alker B. Dentin surface roughness vs. bond strength of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater. 1989 Sep;5(5):319-23. doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(89)90123-1.
- Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjor IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2007 Mar;11(1):5-33. doi: 10.1007/s00784-006-0095-7. Epub 2007 Jan 30. Erratum In: Clin Oral Investig. 2008 Mar;12(1):97.
- Lange RT, Pfeiffer P. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2009 May-Jun;34(3):263-72. doi: 10.2341/08-95.
- Mowery AS Jr, Parker M, Davis EL. Dentin bonding: the effect of surface roughness on shear bond strength. Oper Dent. 1987 Summer;12(3):91-4. No abstract available.
- Price RB, Sutow EJ. Micrographic and profilometric evaluation of the finish produced by diamond and tungsten carbide finishing burs on enamel and dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 1988 Sep;60(3):311-6. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90275-2. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- UDDS-FixPro-01-2016
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.