Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy and Optical Coherence Tomography for Diagnosing ILD.

September 19, 2017 updated by: Prof J.T. Annema, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy and OCT for Diagnosing ILD, a Comparison With Imaging and Pathology.

Often, assessing a classifying diagnosis in patients with interstitial lung disease provides a diagnostic challenge. Currently HRCT, endoscopic or surgical video assisted thoracoscopic surgery(VATS) assessment including lung biopsies are diagnostic tools for patients with suspected ILD. However, tissue acquisition is associated with morbidity in these patients with an already compromised pulmonary function. In clinical practice this results in the fact that only a minor part of patients with an indication for tissue acquisition are actually undergoing biopsies. The aim of this study is to determine ILD-characteristics on imagign collected with minimal invasive novel optical techniques, to examine whether the addition of novel optical techniques to the diagnostic process of ILD could potentially limit the need for a tissue- (surgical) diagnosis and/or reduce the sampling error rate of biopsies by providing additional information on biopsy location.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Novel probe based optical techniques such as Confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) and Optical coherence tomography (pOCT) are non-invasive optical techniques, compatible with conventional diagnostic bronchoscopes and provide non-invasive, real-time information on the airway wall and the alveolar compartment. Therefore, immediate validation of optical measurements during a biopsy is possible. Optical techniques might either obviate the need for an tissue biopsy or improve the diagnostic yield of conventional biopsy methods and make surgical lung biopsies that are associated with high morbidity and costs redundant.

Hypothesis: Novel optical techniques (pCLE and pOCT) provide real time information about the characteristics of the mucosa and/or the alveolar compartment in ILD.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Netherlands
    • Noord-Holland
      • Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
        • Academisch Medisch Centrum

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients of 18 years or older (n=20), who are suspected for ILD based on imaging (HRCT-scan) and with an indication for bronchoscopy with cryobiopsy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age

    • Supected ILD and referred for diagnostic bronchoscopic procedure with cryobiopsy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smoked in the last 6 months
  • Inability and willingness to provide informed consent
  • Inability to comply with the study protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ILD patients
ILD patients scheduled for diagnostic bronchoscopy with biopsy and/or broncho-alveolar lavage will undergo additional imagaing with probe based optical techniques.
Device: Probe based optical techniques
During the diagnostic bronchoscopy, optical biopsy of the mucosa and alveolar compartment will be conducted by two different probe based optical techniques (Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (Mauna Kea technologies) and Optical Coherence Tomography (St Jude Medical)). After the study measurements a biopsy will be obtained in the same area.
Other Names:
  • Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (Mauna Kea technologies)
  • Optical Coherence Tomography (St Jude medical)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Describing visual characteristics on CLE-imaging and pOCT imaging of ILD.
Time Frame: cross sectional (1 day)
cross sectional (1 day)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
(um), size of the alveolar openings, number of cells on CLE imaging of the alveolar space (um).
Time Frame: cross-sectional (1 day)
cross-sectional (1 day)
Size of the alveolar openings (um), thickness of the alveolar septum/alveolar openings on pOCT imaging of the alveolar compartment (um).
Time Frame: cross-sectional (1day)
cross-sectional (1day)
Feasibility of pOCT alveolar compartment: measuring number of alveoli, trajectory in OCT pull-back with alveoli (mm), number of study-related adverse events.
Time Frame: cross-sectional (1 day)
cross-sectional (1 day)
Correlation between pOCT imaging and histology (alveolar septum-thickness and alveolar space (um))
Time Frame: cross-sectional (1 day)
cross-sectional (1 day)
Correlation between pOCT imaging and histology (alveolar septum thickness (um) and alveolar compartment (mm)
Time Frame: cross-sectional (1 day)
cross-sectional (1 day)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jouke T Annema, MD, PhD, Netherlands, Academisch Medisch Centrum

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 28, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 22, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 22, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 18, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 23, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 20, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 19, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NL 54612.018.15

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

CLE and OCT imaging

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings