Dry Needling Effectiveness of Patients on Break Anterior Cruciate Ligament. (ACL)

March 1, 2016 updated by: Jorge Velázquez Saornil, European University Spain

Dry Needling Effectiveness of Patients on Break Anterior Cruciate Ligament. Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

We will conduct a randomized clinical trial observing forty patients divided into two groups: one group composed of twenty individuals undergoing surgery for ruptured ACL, which perform dry needling of myofascial trigger (PGM) point of the vastus muscle and then perform techniques proprioception (group a); and twenty patients not be treated with dry needling after ACL surgery, using only proprioceptive exercises to the joint (group B).

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

It carries out a last fifteen days ECA surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Twenty individuals in a group to be subjected to a technique of physiotherapy, dry needling were included. (Group A). Another group of twenty patients treated with conservative treatment performed a stability exercises and proprioception (Group B). Forty-six patients will be examined s. None had been previously operated by joint instability and all subjects were previously subjected to a diagnostic study by nuclear magnetic resonance before surgery and the diagnosis was confirmed by additional diagnostic testing. All patients will be evaluated by a physical therapist and Myofascial Trigger Point (PGM) of the vastus muscle will be evaluated.

patients using the following variables are evaluated:

  • Pain: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used.
  • Stiffness and physical function using the WOMAC scale (The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index.).
  • Range of motion of the knee joint: Scale ROM.
  • Muscular strength, balance and propiocepción: Star Excursion by Balance Scale Test.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Jorge Velázquez Saornil
        • Contact:
          • Jorge Velázquez, Mr
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jorge Velázquez, Mr
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Beatriz Ruiz, Mrs
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • César Calvo, Mr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • over eighteen and anatomically mature surgically break LCA and valued above using MRI and functional tests to confirm the rupture of the ligament.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who did not reach 18 years of age and those over 55,
  • postoperative complications
  • cause myofascial or neuropathic pain in the lower limb, as lumba-sacral radiculopathy, neuropraxia, neurotmesis, axonotmesis or meralgia paresthetica;
  • fibromyalgia.
  • hypothyroidism
  • iron deficiencies and patients who had a fear of needles (fear of needles).
  • Lower limb differences.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: dry needling
Dry needling on the vastus is performed in patients undergoing ACL fortnight after the intervention and then evaluated. REL dry needling while supplies last twenty insertions before treatment, at midnight, a week and five weeks.
dry needling Travell and Simons
Active Comparator: Stability and propioception
Proprioception and stability exercises in patients undergoing ACL fortnight after the intervention and then evaluates performed before treatment, at midnight, a week and five weeks.
Start excursion balance test, WOMAC; ROM, EVA.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Degree range of motion (ROM)
Time Frame: 24 hours
24 hours
Scores ofThe Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: 24 hours
24 hours
Pain scores visual analog scale (EVA)
Time Frame: 24 hours
24 hours
Scores of STAR BALANCE TEST
Time Frame: 24
24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Degree range of motion (ROM)
Time Frame: 1 week
1 week
Degree range of motion (ROM)
Time Frame: 5 weeks
5 weeks
Scores ofThe Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: 1 week
1 week
Scores ofThe Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: 5 weeks
5 weeks
Pain scores visual analog scale (EVA)
Time Frame: 1 week
1 week
Pain scores visual analog scale (EVA)
Time Frame: 5 weeks
5 weeks
Scores STAR BALANCE TEST
Time Frame: 1week
1week
Scores STAR BALANCE TEST
Time Frame: 5 weeks
5 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jorge Velázquez, Sr, European University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 4, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 4, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • European University

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.