Evaluating the Clinical Cost-effectiveness of Two Primary Mental Health Service Frameworks in Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Two primary mental health service frameworks in Yogyakarta are compared: the specialist framework and the enhanced usual care framework. Both frameworks have not been evaluated in the Indonesian context, despite their potential to be the framework of choice for other provincial and district governments to adopt. Extension to existing services has been planned, which provides us with the opportunity to implement in a random manner the enhanced usual care framework in new areas.
This study aims to compare after 6 months and 12 months, the effectiveness of a specialist model of mental health care and an enhanced usual care (task-sharing) framework, in terms of reducing mental health symptoms, reducing disability, and improving quality of life, as well as the health services costs (and potentially societal costs) associated with these outcomes in 400 patients. This study receives ground-level support from the Centre for Public Mental Health, Universitas Gadjah Mada, which manages the specialist primary mental health framework in Yogyakarta province, regional and national-level support from the Ministry of Health of Indonesia, and will be hopefully funded by the LPDP, Ministry of Finance of Indonesia.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
D.I Yogyakarta
-
Yogyakarta, D.I Yogyakarta, Indonesia
- Centre for Public Mental Health
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants are adults who meet the screening criteria for depression and anxiety on the self-report General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Potential participants who are currently receiving treatment for any mental health disorders will not be invited to participate in the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Specialist
Assessment and treatment of common mental disorders by a clinical psychologist in primary care facilities.
|
Behaviour Therapy or Cognitive Behaviour Therapy which forms "service as usual" in primary care centres in Indonesia.
|
|
Experimental: Enhanced Usual Care
Assessment and treatment of common mental disorders by a general practitioner and nurse practitioner, who have been trained in the WHO mhGap manual, in primary care facilities.
|
Behaviour Therapy or Cognitive Behaviour Therapy which forms "service as usual" in primary care centres in Indonesia.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Health of Nations Outcomes Scale (HoNOS) score from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Measures health and social functioning of participants
|
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
|
Change in Clinical Interview Schedule Revised (CIS-R) score from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Measures the presence and severity of psychiatric symptoms
|
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) score from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Measures type and extent of disability of participants
|
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
|
Change in European Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) score from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Measures quality of life of participants
|
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
|
Utility of service as measured by Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Measures service utility within the time frame
|
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Tine Van Bortel, University of Cambridge
- Study Chair: Carol Brayne, University of Cambridge
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- PRE.2015.108
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Study Data/Documents
-
Complete Data Set
Information identifier: 10.17863/CAM.43399
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.