Dasatinib or Nilotinib Followed by Imatinib in Patients With Newly Diagnosed, Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

November 1, 2018 updated by: William Blum, Emory University

First-Line Dasatinib or Nilotinib Followed by Response Guided Switch to Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

This phase II trial studies how well dasatinib, nilotinib, and imatinib mesylate works in treating patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated chronic myeloid leukemia in which fewer than 10% of the cells in the blood and bone marrow are blast cells (immature blood cells) (chronic phase). Dasatinib, nilotinib, and imatinib mesylate may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To assess incidence of major molecular response (MMR) at 12 months.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess progression free survival (PFS) at 12 and 24 months.

II. To assess accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP) transformation-free survival at 12 and 24 months.

III. To assess incidence of deep MRs (≥ MR⁴) at 12 months and 24 months.

IV. To assess safety.

V. To assess patient reported outcomes (PRO).

TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess prognostic significance of detecting aberrant myeloid or lymphoid markers on diagnostic bone marrow.

II. To assess ability to enroll subjects who maintain deep molecular remissions in tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) discontinuation trials.

OUTLINE:

Patients receive dasatinib orally (PO) once a day (QD) or nilotinib PO twice a day (BID) at the discretion of the treating hematologist. Patients achieving either a 1 log reduction at 3 months or a 2 log reduction at 6 months in their breakpoint cluster region-abelson murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1 (BCR-ABL1) transcript levels may switch to imatinib mesylate PO QD.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 2 weeks and then up to 60 months.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
7

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory University/Winship Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed, previously untreated chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) (by World Health Organization [WHO] definition) (hydroxyurea permitted up to 7 days prior to enrollment)
  • Clinically significant gastrointestinal disease, digestive dysfunction, or surgery that would compromise absorption of oral administration of medications
  • Able to give written informed consent and comply with all study visits and procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in AP or BP
  • Unable to receive TKI for insurance reasons (uninsurable)
  • Refuse or unable to perform telephone or video conferences with research coordinator
  • Subjects who are pregnant, breast feeding or sexually active and unwilling to use effective birth control while on treatment with TKI
  • Any medical or psychological condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, might interfere with the subject's participation in the trial, poses any additional risk for the subject, or confounds the assessment of the subject

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Treatment-dasatinib, nilotinib, imatinib
Patients receive dasatinib orally (PO) once a day (QD) or nilotinib PO twice a day (BID) at the discretion of the treating hematologist. Patients achieving either a 1 log reduction at 3 months or a 2 log reduction at 6 months in their breakpoint cluster region-abelson murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1 (BCR-ABL1) transcript levels may switch to imatinib mesylate PO QD.
Drug: Imatinib Mesylate
Given orally
Other Names:
  • Gleevec
  • CGP57148B
  • Glivec
  • STI-571
Drug: Dasatinib
Given orally
Other Names:
  • BMS-354825
  • Sprycel
Drug: Nilotinib
Given orally
Other Names:
  • AMN 107
  • Tasigna

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Proportion of Subjects Who Achieve Major Molecular Response (MMR)
Time Frame: At 12 months
Response will be measured by a decrease in fusion transcript or protein resulting from the 9;22 chromosomal translocation responsible for formation of the Philadelphia Chromosome (BCR-ABL1) levels on a logarithmic scale. A 1 log reduction is a drop to below 10%, while a major molecular response (MMR) is defined as a 3 log reduction (0.1%).
At 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accelerated Phase (AP) or Blast Phase (BP) Free Survival
Time Frame: The time of CML diagnosis to the time of transformation to AP or BP, assessed up to 24 months
Survival will be defined as the time from CML diagnosis to the time of transformation to accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP).
The time of CML diagnosis to the time of transformation to AP or BP, assessed up to 24 months
Change in Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) Score Extracted From the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML)
Time Frame: Baseline to up to 12 months
The patient reported outcomes (PRO) score extracted from the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI)-Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) will be determined and intra and inter subject changes will be compared.
Baseline to up to 12 months
Duration of Adverse Events (AEs) Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 Criteria
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after the end-of-treatment
Listings of laboratory test results will also be generated, and descriptive statistics summarizing the changes in laboratory tests over time will be presented. Exposure to drug over time will also be summarized. The AE incidence rates, as well as the frequency of occurrence of overall toxicity, categorized by toxicity grades (severity) will be described as obtained from subject forms and subject communications.
Up to 30 days after the end-of-treatment
Frequency of Adverse Events (AEs) Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (CTCAE v4.03) Criteria
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after the end-of-treatment
Listings of laboratory test results will also be generated, and descriptive statistics summarizing the changes in laboratory tests over time will be presented. Exposure to drug over time will also be summarized. The AE incidence rates, as well as the frequency of occurrence of overall toxicity, categorized by toxicity grades (severity) will be described as obtained from subject forms and subject communications.
Up to 30 days after the end-of-treatment
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: The time of CML diagnosis to the time of loss of MMR or loss of hematologic response, assessed up to 24 months
Progression free survival (PFS) will be defined as the time from CML diagnosis to the time of loss of major molecular response (MMR) or loss of hematologic response.
The time of CML diagnosis to the time of loss of MMR or loss of hematologic response, assessed up to 24 months
Severity of Adverse Events (AEs) Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 Criteria
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after the end-of-treatment
Listings of laboratory test results will also be generated, and descriptive statistics summarizing the changes in laboratory tests over time will be presented. Exposure to drug over time will also be summarized. The AE incidence rates, as well as the frequency of occurrence of overall toxicity, categorized by toxicity grades (severity) will be described as obtained from subject forms and subject communications.
Up to 30 days after the end-of-treatment
The Number of Subjects With Breakpoint Cluster Region-abelson Murine Leukemia Viral Oncogene Homolog 1 (BCR-ABL1) Transcript Levels ≤ Deep Molecular Responses (MR⁴)
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Descriptive statistics will summarize the changes in breakpoint cluster region-abelson murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1 (BCR-ABL1) testing over time will be presented.
Up to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Emory University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 10, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 10, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 1, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00087045
  • NCI-2016-00162 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
  • Winship3143-16 (Other Identifier: Emory University/Winship Cancer Institute)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Imatinib Mesylate

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings