Patient Engagement Initiative (PEI)
Engaging Surrogates and Physicians to Ensure Concordant Critical Care
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
- Johns Hopkins Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Licensed physicians
- At least 4 weeks of clinical work in an I.C.U. in the U.S.A. during the past 12 months
Exclusion Criteria:
- <25 years old
- Non-English speaking
- Primarily practicing medicine outside the U.S.A.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control
Prompts standard to rounds or electronic medical records.
|
|
|
Experimental: Prompting Intervention
Prompting consideration of 3-month functional outcome.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Presence of acceptable treatment option as assessed by a checklist completed by clinical colleges.
Time Frame: 0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
|
0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Level of conflict with proxy with a previously validated single question
Time Frame: 0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
|
0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
|
|
Level of shared decision-making measured using CollaboRATE scale
Time Frame: 0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
|
0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
|
|
Prevalence of communication skills for involving ICU proxies in treatment decisions assessed by a checklist completed by clinical colleges
Time Frame: 0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
|
0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
|
|
Medical interactions assessed using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS)
Time Frame: 0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
|
0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
|
|
Prevalence of the discussed option of stopping life support as assessed by blinded assessors
Time Frame: 0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
|
0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
|
|
Prevalence of conveying prognosis as assessed by blinded assessors
Time Frame: 0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
|
0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
|
|
Level of shared decision-making measured using CollaboRATE scale as assessed by blinded assessors
Time Frame: 0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
|
0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
|
|
The Observer OPTIONS5 measure completed by blinded assessors
Time Frame: 0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
|
0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
|
|
Consulting services requested by study participants
Time Frame: 0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
|
0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Alison E Turnbull, Johns Hopkins University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Abshire MA, Li X, Basyal PS, Teply ML, Singh AL, Hayes MM, Turnbull AE. Actor feedback and rigorous monitoring: Essential quality assurance tools for testing behavioral interventions with simulation. PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233538. eCollection 2020.
- Turnbull AE, Hayes MM, Brower RG, Colantuoni E, Basyal PS, White DB, Curtis JR, Needham DM. Effect of Documenting Prognosis on the Information Provided to ICU Proxies: A Randomized Trial. Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;47(6):757-764. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003731.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00082272
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.