Simplified IUD Insertion Technique (SIIT)
Simplified IUD Insertion Technique: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women 18 years and older presenting to contraceptive clinic in Gaborone, Botswana for IUD insertion and have ability to give informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known contradictions to copper IUD, inability to comply with study protocol
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
NO_INTERVENTION: Arm 1: Traditional IUD Insertion
Standard IUD insertion according to package insert.
Bimanual pelvic exam to assess uterine size and position will be performed.
Uterine sound will be used to measure depth of uterus prior to insertion.
|
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Arm 2: Simplified IUD Insertion
Simplified, investigational IUD insertion performed.
No bimanual pelvic exam or uterine sounding.
|
IUD Insertion with no bimanual pelvic exam or uterine sounding.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Correct IUD Placement Immediately Post-Insertion
Time Frame: Immediately post-insertion
|
Percent of correct IUD placements between control (traditional IUD insertion) and experimental (simplified IUD insertion) groups at time of insertion as visualized by transvaginal ultrasound.
|
Immediately post-insertion
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Correct IUD Placements 4-6 Weeks Post-Insertion
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks post-insertion
|
Percent of correct IUD placements between control (traditional IUD insertion) and experimental (simplified IUD insertion) groups at 4-6 weeks after insertion as visualized by transvaginal ultrasound.
|
4-6 weeks post-insertion
|
|
Patient Satisfaction with IUD Insertion
Time Frame: Immediately Post-Insertion
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
|
Immediately Post-Insertion
|
|
Patient Pain Scores (VAS)
Time Frame: Immediately Post-Insertion
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
|
Immediately Post-Insertion
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Tayal VS, Crean CA, Norton HJ, Schulz CJ, Bacalis KN, Bliss S. Prospective comparative trial of endovaginal sonographic bimanual examination versus traditional digital bimanual examination in nonpregnant women with lower abdominal pain with regard to body mass index classification. J Ultrasound Med. 2008 Aug;27(8):1171-7. doi: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.8.1171.
- Padilla LA, Radosevich DM, Milad MP. Limitations of the pelvic examination for evaluation of the female pelvic organs. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Jan;88(1):84-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.09.015.
- Maguire K, Davis A, Rosario Tejeda L, Westhoff C. Intracervical lidocaine gel for intrauterine device insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2012 Sep;86(3):214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
- Canteiro R, Bahamondes MV, dos Santos Fernandes A, Espejo-Arce X, Marchi NM, Bahamondes L. Length of the endometrial cavity as measured by uterine sounding and ultrasonography in women of different parities. Contraception. 2010 Jun;81(6):515-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.01.006. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
- Bahamondes MV, Monteiro I, Canteiro R, Fernandes Ados S, Bahamondes L. Length of the endometrial cavity and intrauterine contraceptive device expulsion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Apr;113(1):50-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.10.013. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
- Heinemann K, Reed S, Moehner S, Minh TD. Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices. Contraception. 2015 Apr;91(4):274-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
- Christensen K, et al. Simplifying Insertion of IUD Devices. Selected for poster presentation at FIGO 2015, Vancouver British Columbia.
- ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Intrauterine devices and intrauterine systems. Hum Reprod Update. 2008 May-Jun;14(3):197-208. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn003. Epub 2008 Apr 9.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB-35138
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.