Pilot Study of Sodium Bicarbonate in Generally Healthy People With Low Bicarbonate

November 11, 2018 updated by: Kalani Raphael, University of Utah
The goal of this pilot study is to determine whether oral sodium bicarbonate can raise low serum bicarbonate concentration in people without chronic kidney disease (CKD). Participants will take sodium bicarbonate for six weeks, followed by a four week washout period.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

CKD affects 25 million Americans and the risks of cardiovascular morbidity, hospitalizations, and death are substantially higher for people with CKD. Furthermore, 6% of the total Medicare budget is spent on 600,000 people with end-stage renal disease. Thus, CKD is highly prevalent, associates with poor outcomes, and is a tremendous financial burden to society.

Apart from treating hypertension and diabetes, there are no therapies that prevent CKD. However, results from two studies have found that low serum bicarbonate levels increase risk of developing CKD, which suggests that normalizing low serum bicarbonate may prevent CKD.

One way to raise low serum bicarbonate is by taking sodium bicarbonate. Whether sodium bicarbonate, which is commonly prescribed to raise low serum bicarbonate in people with CKD, can raise low bicarbonate in people without CKD is uncertain because the reason bicarbonate is low in people without CKD is unclear. This is because low bicarbonate by itself cannot distinguish whether the acid-base abnormality is primary metabolic acidosis or respiratory alkalosis. The former process is readily corrected with alkali. However, the administration of alkali in the latter situation may not raise bicarbonate concentration.

Therefore, the purpose of this pilot study is to determine whether oral sodium bicarbonate can raise low serum bicarbonate in people without renal disease.

The study is a single-arm open label study of 15 individuals without CKD with low serum bicarbonate concentration. The study duration is 10 weeks. After completing the baseline visit, participants will take oral sodium bicarbonate (initial dose level: 0.3 milliequivalents per kilogram per day (mEq/kg/d) for 6 weeks (On-treatment period), followed by a 4 week Off-treatment period. Serum concentrations of sodium bicarbonate will be tested during the treatment period, at the end of the On-treatment period (Week 6) and at the end of the Off-treatment period (Week 10).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
7

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112
        • VA Salt Lake City Healthcare System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

46 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73m2
  • Urinary albumin/creatinine ratio < 30 mg/gm
  • Serum bicarbonate ≤ 23 mEq/L (average of the two most recent measurements within the past year)
  • Age ≥ 50 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Blood pressure ≥ 160/100 mm Hg
  • Serum potassium < 3.5 mEq/L
  • New York Heart Association Class 3 or 4 heart failure symptoms
  • Chronic oxygen therapy
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring daily bronchodilator or prednisone therapy
  • Weight ≥ 160 kg
  • Use of sodium bicarbonate, sodium citrate, potassium citrate, or potassium bicarbonate within the previous two weeks.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Sodium Bicarbonate

All participants will receive oral sodium bicarbonate for 6 weeks (On-treatment period). After the 6 week visit, participants will stop taking sodium bicarbonate and return for a final visit 4 weeks later (Off-treatment period).

The initial dose of sodium bicarbonate prescribed is 0.3 mEq/kg/d. If a subject meets the protocol criteria, the dose will be increased to 0.6 mEq/kg/d. Half the dose will be taken by mouth in the morning and the other half in the evening.
Dietary supplement: Sodium bicarbonate
The initial dose of sodium bicarbonate is 0.3 mEq/kg/d. If a subject meets the protocol criteria, the dose will be increased to 0.6 mEq/kg/d.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in serum bicarbonate concentration from baseline to 6 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Comparison of pre-intervention serum bicarbonate levels to week 6 levels following treatment with oral sodium bicarbonate.
Baseline and 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in serum bicarbonate concentration after 4 weeks of stopping sodium bicarbonate treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 10 weeks
Comparison of serum bicarbonate levels four weeks after discontinuing oral sodium bicarbonate treatment to pre-intervention (baseline) and immediate post-treatment (week 6) serum bicarbonate levels.
Baseline, 6 weeks and 10 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Utah

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
The University of Utah Center on Aging

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kalani L Raphael, MD, VA Salt Lake City Healthcare System

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 14, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 14, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 6, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 13, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 14, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 11, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 81006

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings