Safety and Efficacy of Acute Normovolemic Hemodilution in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Patients

May 14, 2019 updated by: Weronika Crescini, MD, Oregon Health and Science University

The Efficacy and Safety of Acute Normovolemic Hemodilution in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Patients

The investigators primary objective is to determine if acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) for pediatric cardiac surgical patients decreases the volume of blood products transfused during surgery and the immediate post-operative period as compared to usual care. This study will enroll 24 pediatric heart surgery patients, aged 6 months to 3 years old undergoing either ANH prior to initiating cardiopulmonary bypass or the standard of care procedures for the use of cardiopulmonary bypass.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Blood transfusion has been associated with worse outcomes in pediatric cardiac surgical patients. The major complications associated with it include increased blood loss during and after surgery, kidney disease requiring dialysis, abnormal coagulation profile, increased vasopressor use, and increased time spent on the ventilator and in the intensive care unit. One strategy to minimize blood product administration is acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH). The investigators primary aim is to determine if ANH for pediatric cardiac surgical patients decreases the volume of blood products transfused during surgery and the immediate post-operative period, compared to usual care. The investigators designed a randomized, controlled, open label study that equally assigns 24 pediatric cardiac surgery patients aged 6 months to 3 years into two groups to receive either ANH prior to initiating cardiopulmonary bypass or usual standard of care. Participants in the ANH arm of the study will have 10 ml/kg of blood removed following anesthetic induction. In order to maintain normal circulating volume, the collected blood will be replaced with an equal volume of 5% albumin. All participants will be treated with a standardized protocol aimed at blood conservation including the use of retrograde arterial and antegrade venous perfusion, small circuit size, intraoperative red blood cell salvage, and low hemoglobin targets to trigger transfusion.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
24

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health and Science University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 3 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed signed consent must be obtained by a legally authorized representative.
  • Must be undergoing an elective surgical repair or palliation of a cardiac defect with the use of the cardiopulmonary bypass machine.
  • Must be clinically stable at the time of evaluation for eligibility and on the day of randomization.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who carry a diagnosis of a bleeding disorder.
  • Patients who have an abnormal coagulation profile as evidenced by a preoperative coagulation screen.
  • Patients who have received a blood transfusion in the preceding 120 days.
  • Patients who have a diagnosis of a chromosomal abnormality.
  • Patients whose participation in the study is deemed unsafe by their primary care team.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Standard of Care Control
This group will consist of all the participants that receive the standard of care treatment for elective surgical repair or palliation of their cardiac defect with the use of the cardiopulmonary bypass machine.
Experimental: Acute Normovolemic Hemodilution
This group will consist of all the participants that receive the acute normovolemic hemodilution prior to their elective surgical repair or palliation of their cardiac defect with the use of the cardiopulmonary bypass machine.
Procedure: Acute Normovolemic hemodilution
ANH is a technique in which a portion of the patients' own blood is removed before any surgical bleeding occurs. It is stored until the end of the operation, at which point it is returned to the patient.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness of ANH to decrease volume of blood products during surgery and the immediate post-operative period.
Time Frame: 2 Days
This will be measured by comparing the volume (mL/Kg body weight) of any blood products administered peri-operatively between the two groups.
2 Days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Kidney function
Time Frame: 2 days
This will be measured by the change in creatinine on postoperative day 2 from the pre-operative baseline value
2 days
Normalization of thromboelastogrpahy (TEG) MA value (maximum amplitude)
Time Frame: 2 days
This will be measured by thromboelastography (TEG) test following end of cardiopulmonary bypass
2 days
Normalization of thromboelastography (TEG) R value (reaction time)
Time Frame: 2 days
This will be measured by thromboelastography (TEG) test following end of cardiopulmonary bypass
2 days
Normalization of thromboelastography (TEG) Alpha Angle value
Time Frame: 2 days
This will be measured by thromboelastography (TEG) test following end of cardiopulmonary bypass
2 days
Final hematocrit, platelet count, PT/PTT on ICU admission
Time Frame: 1 day
These lab values will be recorded and compared for each group.
1 day
Hematocrit and platelet count on post-operative day 1
Time Frame: 1 days
These lab values will be recorded and compared for each group.
1 days
Time to end of vasoactive support in the first 24 hours post-operation.
Time Frame: 1 days
This value will be recorded and compared for each group.
1 days
Duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay
Time Frame: 8 days
This value will be recorded and compared for each group.
8 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Oregon Health and Science University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
The Gerber Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Miriam Treggiari, MD, Oregon Health and Science University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 30, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 13, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 21, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 14, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB#: 11949

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

There are no plans to share the data collected during this study.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings