Cingularbio® Heart Valve Clincial Study
A Prospective, Mutli-center, Open Lable, Single Arm Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Cingularbio® Heart Valve in Aortic/Mitral Valve Replacement Patients
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Cingularbio® Heart valve
the patients will replaced by artificial heart valve
|
the patients will be replaced by Cingularbio heart valve
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
device related adverse valve events
Time Frame: 12 month
|
device related events including Thromboembolism, Valve thrombosis,Major hemorrhage, Major paravalvular leak
|
12 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
rate of procedural success
Time Frame: post-operative
|
device implant success
|
post-operative
|
|
the difference between baseline and 1 year in Effective orifice area (EOA)
Time Frame: 1year
|
the difference between baseline and 1 year in Effective orifice area (EOA) in echocardiographic hemodynamic
|
1year
|
|
the difference between baseline and 1 year in pressure gradient (PG)
Time Frame: 1year
|
the difference between baseline and 1 year in pressure gradient (PG) in echocardiographic hemodynamic
|
1year
|
|
the difference between baseline and 1 year in Peak aortic valve velocity
Time Frame: 1year
|
the difference between baseline and 1 year in Peak aortic valve velocity in echocardiographic hemodynamic
|
1year
|
|
improvement in NYHA functional class
Time Frame: 1year
|
the NYHA score between baseline and 1 year
|
1year
|
|
mortality
Time Frame: 1 year
|
the mortality rate at 1 year
|
1 year
|
|
structural valve deterioration
Time Frame: 1 year
|
the SVD rate at 1 year
|
1 year
|
|
reoperation
Time Frame: 1 year
|
the reoperation rate at 1 year
|
1 year
|
|
valve-related adverse events
Time Frame: 1 year
|
all valve related AEs (not primary endpoint events) at 1 year
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: chunsheng wang, Fudan University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- XZBM-2015-01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.