Comparison of Extraperitoneal and Intraperitoneal Cesarean Technique
Comparison of Extraperitoneal and Intraperitoneal Cesarean Technique: Double Blind Controlled Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
İstanbul, Turkey, 34668
- Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and Training Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Cesarean section for any reasons
Exclusion Criteria:
- Involuntary
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Extraperitoneal group
Extraperitoneal cesarean section will perform after rectus sheat incision and carefully bladder dissecting.
|
|
|
Active Comparator: Intraperitoneal group
Conventional transperitoneal cesarean will perform
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Pain Scores as measured by the Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 2 days
|
2 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Blood count
Time Frame: 2 days
|
2 days
|
|
C reactive proteins level
Time Frame: 2 days
|
2 days
|
|
Complications
Time Frame: 2 days
|
2 days
|
|
Discharge time
Time Frame: 4 days
|
4 days
|
|
Forced expiratory volume in 1 second
Time Frame: 2 days
|
2 days
|
|
Forced vital capacity
Time Frame: 2 days
|
2 days
|
|
Peak expiratory flow
Time Frame: 2 days
|
2 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Mehmet Baki Şentürk, MD, Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and Training Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Tappauf C, Schest E, Reif P, Lang U, Tamussino K, Schoell W. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a prospective randomized comparison of surgical morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;209(4):338.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.057. Epub 2013 May 30.
- Chou CY, Liang PC, Chen CA, Lee CN. Cervical abscess with vaginal fistula after extraperitoneal Cesarean section. J Formos Med Assoc. 2007 Dec;106(12):1048-51. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60082-0.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 56
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.