Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy for Subscapularis Repair

July 16, 2024 updated by: Columbia University

Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy Versus Tenotomy for Subscapularis Repair During Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

The primary objective of this study is to assess the clinical effectiveness of two different techniques used for subscapularis tendon repair during total shoulder replacement. The investigators hypothesize that participants who receive a newer repair technique called a lesser tuberosity osteotomy will have lower rates of postoperative subscapularis muscle dysfunction and rupture as compared to those who receive the traditional tenotomy repair.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The subscapularis tendon is mobilized during total shoulder arthroplasty in order to gain anterior access to the glenohumeral joint. Postoperative subscapularis dysfunction is being recognized more frequently and has been reported in >65% of patients following shoulder arthroplasty with a soft-tissue repair. Subscapularis dysfunction has been associated with poor functional outcomes including tendon rupture and anterior instability, a major indication for revision surgery. Recent studies suggest that a standard subscapularis tenotomy with primary tendon repair may lead to failure of the repair and decreased functional outcomes as compared to a more novel lesser tuberosity osteotomy technique. The investigators study aims to validate the results of the current literature in a prospective randomized controlled trial, which to their knowledge has not been reported on this topic.Investigators will compare clinical outcomes following these two techniques during total shoulder arthroplasty. Participants undergoing total shoulder replacement will be randomized to receive either a lesser tuberosity osteotomy or tenotomy with primary subscapularis tendon repair. All other procedures conducted in this study are considered standard of care except for ultrasounds, which are conducted for research purposes in the subscapularis tenotomy group. Postoperative outcomes will be monitored objectively and subjectively at routine postoperative office visits using physical exam, imaging (X-rays and ultrasounds), and questionnaires. If the hypothesis is proven to be true, the investigators will establish gold-standard evidence for the use of the newer osteotomy technique to improve patient satisfaction and mobility following shoulder arthroplasty.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients already scheduled for total shoulder arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide information throughout postoperative recovery and attend subsequent office visits thereafter (a minimum of one year).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Tenotomy
Subjects will receive shoulder prosthesis for subscapularis repair during TSA with tenotomy technique.
Procedure: TSA with tenotomy technique
Standard procedure: Utilization of tenotomy for mobilization of subscapularis during total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The subscapularis tendon is incised close to its attachment on the humerus. The Tendon is repaired with sutures.
Device: Shoulder prosthesis
Standard procedure: Total shoulder arthroplasty replaces both components of the "ball and socket" joint with a metal device.
Active Comparator: Osteotomy
Subjects will receive shoulder prosthesis for subscapularis repair during TSA with lesser tuberosity osteotomy technique.
Device: Shoulder prosthesis
Standard procedure: Total shoulder arthroplasty replaces both components of the "ball and socket" joint with a metal device.
Procedure: TSA with lesser tuberosity osteotomy technique
Standard procedure: Utilization of the osteotomy to mobilize the subscapularis during TSA. A small fleck of bone is removed from humerus, the subscapularis tendon is still attached. The fleck of bone is reattached with sutures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Subjects With Radiologic Evidence of Anatomic Healing
Time Frame: Post operative at 1 year
Tendon healing/tuberosity union based on radiographs
Post operative at 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 1 year post-operatively
Pain indication measurement where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain. Mean score is reported without a range or standard deviation.
1 year post-operatively
Forward Elevation (FE) Strength
Time Frame: 1 year post-operatively
Strength testing with Dynamometer in forward elevation was conducted to determine the mean in FE strength.
1 year post-operatively
Total Intra-Operative Time
Time Frame: From incision time to time of complete skin closure
To be recorded in minutes, and documented by the surgical team
From incision time to time of complete skin closure
Total Subscapularis Repair Time (in Minutes)
Time Frame: From glenoid implantation to completion of tendon or osteotomy repair
To be recorded in minutes, and documented by the surgical team
From glenoid implantation to completion of tendon or osteotomy repair
External Rotation (ER) Strength
Time Frame: 1 year post-operatively
Strength testing with Dynamometer in external rotation.
1 year post-operatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Columbia University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: William N. Levine, MD, Columbia University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 19, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 3, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 16, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AAAE1446

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings