Intubation Success Rate_Rigid Video Stylet Vs Video Laryngoscope
Comparison of the Initial Intubation Success Rate Between Video Laryngoscope and Rigid Video Stylet in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Video laryngoscope and lightwand are widely used at endotracheal intubation in cervical spine patients.
Video laryngoscope is useful because of identification of anatomic structure around the oral cavity and vocal cord.
Rigid video stylet resemble lightwand, but it has a video at the end of stylet. So rigid video stylet is useful at confirmation of vocal cord.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Je Do Son, MD
- Phone Number: 82-2-2072-2469
- Email: handsystem@naver.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 20~80 years old adult patients, ASA class I-III
- Cervical spine surgery in general anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who did not agree with the study
- History of GERD
- Congenital or acquired lesion like tumor, polyp, trauma, abcess, inflammation, foreign body
- Surgery of trachea or airway
- History of radiation around neck area
- Increased possibility of aspiration
- Coagulation abnormality
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: TRIPLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Optiscope
Endotracheal intubation by rigid video stylet, manufactural named Optiscope.
|
Other Names:
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: McGrath
Endotracheal intubation by video laryngoscope, manufactural named McGrath.
|
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Comparison of success rate between two groups
Time Frame: immediately
|
immediately
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Survey of blood tinged endotracheal tube, bleeding in oral cavity, hoarseness, sore throat
Time Frame: Within 24 hours after endotracheal intubation
|
Within 24 hours after endotracheal intubation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Wu CN, Ma WH, Wei JQ, Wei HF, Cen QY, Cai QX, Cao Y. Laryngoscope and a new tracheal tube assist lightwand intubation in difficult airways due to unstable cervical spine. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 24;10(3):e0120231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120231. eCollection 2015.
- Aziz MF, Abrons RO, Cattano D, Bayman EO, Swanson DE, Hagberg CA, Todd MM, Brambrink AM. First-Attempt Intubation Success of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients with Anticipated Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the C-MAC D-Blade Versus the GlideScope in a Mixed Provider and Diverse Patient Population. Anesth Analg. 2016 Mar;122(3):740-750. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001084.
- Silverberg MJ, Li N, Acquah SO, Kory PD. Comparison of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy during urgent endotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2015 Mar;43(3):636-41. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000751.
- Dong Y, Li G, Wu W, Su R, Shao Y. Lightwand-guided nasotracheal intubation in oromaxillofacial surgery patients with anticipated difficult airways: a comparison with blind nasal intubation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Sep;42(9):1049-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.01.027. Epub 2013 May 25.
- Kasuya Y, Takahashi E, Nagai M, Ozaki M. [Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Performance between Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope and McGRATH(R) MAC Video Laryngoscope among Anesthesia Trainees]. Masui. 2015 Dec;64(12):1291-6. Japanese.
- Choi JW, Kim JA, Jung HJ, Kim WH. Tracheal Intubation with a McGrath(R) Series 5 Video Laryngoscope by Novice Personnel in a Cervical-immobilized Manikin. J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;50(1):61-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.06.079. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
- Ong J, Lee CL, Lai HY, Lee Y, Chen TY, Shyr MH. A new video intubating device: trachway intubating stylet. Anaesthesia. 2009 Oct;64(10):1145. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06092.x. No abstract available. Erratum In: Anaesthesia. 2009 Nov;64(11):1272.
- Yang M, Kim JA, Ahn HJ, Choi JW, Kim DK, Cho EA. Double-lumen tube tracheal intubation using a rigid video-stylet: a randomized controlled comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Dec;111(6):990-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet281. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
- Kim JK, Kim JA, Kim CS, Ahn HJ, Yang MK, Choi SJ. Comparison of tracheal intubation with the Airway Scope or Clarus Video System in patients with cervical collars. Anaesthesia. 2011 Aug;66(8):694-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06762.x. Epub 2011 May 13.
- Turkstra TP, Craen RA, Pelz DM, Gelb AW. Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison during intubation with lighted stylet, GlideScope, and Macintosh laryngoscope. Anesth Analg. 2005 Sep;101(3):910-915. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000166975.38649.27. Erratum In: Anesth Analg. 2005 Oct;101(4):1011.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Rigid video stylet intubation
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.