Motor Learning for the Lumbar Spine Using Sensor-based Postural Feedback: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Thomas Matheve, drs.
- Email: Thomas.Matheve@UHasselt.be
Study Locations
-
-
-
Diepenbeek, Belgium, 3590
- Recruiting
- Universiteit Hasselt
-
Contact:
- Thomas Matheve, drs.
-
Principal Investigator:
- Martine Timmermans, prof. dr.
-
Hasselt, Belgium, 3500
- Recruiting
- Jessa Ziekenhuis
-
Contact:
- Thomas Matheve, drs.
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Enzo Olivieri, dr.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Chronic non-specific low back pain
- Age 18-65
- Able to understand Dutch
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects that received lumbar stabilization exercises in the past year
- Spinal surgery in the past
- Pregnancy
- Serious underlying pathologies (e.g. multiple sclerosis, tumors,…)
- Signs or symptoms of nerve root involvement
- Any physical condition at the moment of testing that can interfere with activities of daily living (e.g. serious knee pain)
- Known skin-allergy for tape
- BMI > 30kg/m²
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Sensor-based postural feedback
Subjects will receive visual feedback on a computer screen while practicing the motor control task.
The feedback is based on information from from motion sensors that mointor the movements of the lumbar spine
|
Motion tracking sensors will provide feedback to subjects during the learning phase of a motor control task
|
|
Experimental: Mirror Feedback
Subjects will receive feedback from a mirror while practicing the motor control task
|
Subjects will receive feedback from a mirror during the learning phase of a motor control task
|
|
Active Comparator: control group
Subjects will receive no feedback while practicing the motor control task
|
Subjects will receive no feedback during the learning phase of a motor control task
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in lumbopelvic kinematics from baseline to immediately post-intervention
Time Frame: Day 1, immediately post-intervention
|
Kinematics will be assessed using motion sensors that are mounted on the skin at the spinous processes of L1 and S1, and at the femur.
|
Day 1, immediately post-intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
usefulness of feedback (Numeric rating scale 0-10)
Time Frame: Day 1, immediately post-intervention
|
How useful was the feedback that was provided to the subjects during the exercise trials?
|
Day 1, immediately post-intervention
|
|
Pain during the exercise trials (Numeric rating scale 0-10)
Time Frame: Day 1, immediately post-intervention
|
Outcome measure primarily used as possible covariate
|
Day 1, immediately post-intervention
|
|
Fear of low back pain during the exercise trials (Numeric rating scale 0-10)
Time Frame: Day 1, immediately post-intervention
|
Outcome measure primarily used as possible covariate
|
Day 1, immediately post-intervention
|
|
Fear of damaging the lumbar spine during the exercise trials (numeric rating scale 0-10)
Time Frame: Day 1, immediately post-intervention
|
Outcome measure primarily used as possible covariate
|
Day 1, immediately post-intervention
|
|
Borg-scale to measure fatigue during the exercise trials
Time Frame: Day 1, immediately post-intervention
|
Outcome measure primarily used as possible covariate
|
Day 1, immediately post-intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Annick Timmermans, prof. dr., Hasselt University
- Study Chair: Enzo Olivieri, dr., Jessa Ziekenhuis, Hasselt, Belgium
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- AcuteLearningEffects
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.