Comparing Unimanual and Bimanual Mirror Therapy for Upper Limb Recovery Post Stroke
Home Mirror Therapy: A Randomized Control Study Comparing Unimanual and Bimanual Mirror Therapy for Improved Hand Function Post-stroke
The purpose of this randomized controlled study is to
- Examine the feasibility of a home Mirror therapy (MT) program in the NYC metropolitan area;
- Evaluate the effectiveness of home MT versus traditional home exercise program; and
Evaluate the superiority of unimanual or bimanual MT intervention protocols for chronic stroke subjects with moderate hand deficits. Subjects from occupational therapy at the Ambulatory Care Center of NYU Langone Center with a diagnosis of cerebral vascular accident (CVA) or stroke will be divided into three (3) groups:
- Control Group subjects will participate in standard occupational therapy rehabilitation protocol plus a traditional home based exercise program.
- Experimental group 1 subjects will participate in standard rehabilitation protocol plus unimanual home based mirror therapy program
- Experimental group 2 subjects will participate in standard rehabilitation protocol plus bimanual home based mirror therapy program.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10016
- New York University School of Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- First time unilateral stroke > 3 months post stroke.
- Cognitively be able to follow direction
- Cognitively be able to consent to participation in research study
- Moderate/severe deficits as per the Fugl-Meyer assessment score from 10-50 and the ability to grasp and release a small towel or washcloth.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Complex medical problems, that would render the subject unable to participate in an extensive home program
- History of pre-existing neurological or psychiatric diseases, orthopedic conditions of the upper limbs, or peripheral nerve injuries that render the subject unable to sit or to move either upper limb
- Hearing and vision impairments which may impede subjects participation in the home program
- Perceptual deficits such as apraxia, neglect, or agnosias as per clinical evaluation which may impede subjects participation in the home program
- Botox injection in affected arm/hand within 3 months
- Global aphasia that may interfere with understanding instruction for testing or home exercise program.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Control Group
Subjects will participate in standard occupational therapy rehabilitation protocol plus a traditional home based exercise program.
|
Subjects in the control group will receive a traditional home Occupational Training exercise program as per conventional OT guidelines with the same home program duration.
|
|
Experimental Group 1
Subjects will participate in standard rehabilitation protocol plus unimanual home based mirror therapy program
|
The affected hand will remain still in the mirror box, the unaffected hand will perform the exercises while the subject watches the mirror reflection.
|
|
Experimental Group 2
Subjects will participate in standard rehabilitation protocol plus bimanual home based mirror therapy program.
|
The affected hand in the mirror box will best mimic the unaffected hand, while also watching the mirror reflection.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)
Time Frame: Baseline to Six (6) Weeks
|
Gold Standard to evaluate and measure recovery in patients with hemiplegia post stroke.
|
Baseline to Six (6) Weeks
|
|
Grip strength
Time Frame: Baseline to Six (6) Weeks
|
Grip strength is important to measure as it is correlated with stroke recovery.
|
Baseline to Six (6) Weeks
|
|
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Time Frame: Baseline to Six (6) Weeks
|
An interview based tool that measures a subject's perceived difficulty with the use of their arm/hands with activities of daily living post-stroke.
|
Baseline to Six (6) Weeks
|
|
Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0
Time Frame: Baseline to Six (6) Weeks
|
A subjective standardized 59-items 8 domain questionnaire assessing health status post-stroke.
|
Baseline to Six (6) Weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Steve Vanlew, MD, New York University Medical School
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 14-01859
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.