Rapid Diagnosis of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Surgical Critically Ill Patients (TIH)

June 29, 2016 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon

Evaluation of Automated Immunoassay, Particle Gel Immunoassay and Pretest Scoring Systems (4Ts and HEP Scores) in the Diagnosis of Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia in Surgical Critically Ill Patients

The early diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is particularly difficult in surgical critically ill patients. If the use of rapid immunological diagnostic methods and pretest scoring systems has been proposed in the medical intensive care unit (ICU), none of these methods have been specifically evaluated in the diagnosis of HIT in surgical patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is of concern in critically ill patients, given the high prevalence of heparin use. The diagnosis of HIT in surgical intensive care unit (ICU) is problematic due to the lack of reliable diagnostic method. No gold standard currently exists and the definitive diagnosis is mainly based on the detection of heparin-dependent platelet-activating antibodies by ELISA method, on the platelet serotonin release assay (SRA) and on the changes of the blood platelet count after the discontinuation of heparin therapy. As a result, no early definitive diagnosis could be done. This could expose patients to thrombotic complications related to the HIT or hemorrhagic complications related to the alternative anticoagulant prescribed. This complications can threaten the prognosis of these patients. Particle gel immunoassay and automated immunoassay has been proposed for the early diagnosis of HIT in medical critically ill and non-critically ill patients. Many authors suggest that the accuracy of these immunological methods for the diagnosis of HIT could be altered in surgical patients, but these tests has never been specifically evaluated in this population. The 4Ts and the HIT Expert Probability (HEP) score systems sound interesting for the diagnosis of HIT. These clinicobiological scores can be easily used by non-expert clinicians, but have also never been evaluated in the surgical ICU.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Besançon, France, 25030
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients admitted in our surgical intensive care unit (ICU) during the study period will be elligible if the diagnosis of HIT is supected by the attending physician. The diagnosis of the HIT will be suspected in the presence of at least one of the following criteria in a patient receiving an heparin therapy: (1) a thrombocytopenia < 100 G/l or a decrease of the blood platelet count > 40%, (2) a thrombocytopenia between the 5th and the 8th of the heparin therapy, (3)an arterial or a venous thrombosis in a patient receiving heparin, (4)the failure of a treatment of a thrombosis with heparin. These criteria are described in the French guidelines.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years old
  • Diagnosis of HIT suspected
  • Admitted in our surgical intensive care unit during the study period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years old
  • Pregnancy and/or breast feeding
  • Fondaparinux anticoagulation
  • Withdrawal of consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
HIT study group
The HIT study group will include all patients admitted in our surgical intensive care unit (ICU) during the study period if the clinician in charge of the patient suspects the diagnosis of HIT. The HEP score, the 4Ts score, the immuno-diffusion particle gel immunoassay (ID-PaGIA) and the HIT-Ab(PF4-H) test will be done for each patient the day the diagnosis of HIT will be suspected.
Other: HEP score

The HEP score is a clinicobiological score evaluating the probability of the HIT diagnosis.

The HEP score is based on the blood platelet count, the timing of the platelet decrease, the existence of clinical manifestations of HIT (thrombosis, haemorrhage, skin necrosis) and the existence of an other cause of thrombocytopenia.

Other Names:
  • The HEP score is the HIT Expert Probability score.
Other: 4Ts score
The 4Ts score is a clinicobiological score evaluating the probability of the HIT diagnosis. The 4Ts score is based on the change in blood platelet count during heparin therapy, the timing of platelet decrease, the existence of a thrombosis, and the existence of an other cause of thrombocytopenia.
Other: ID-PaGIA test
The ID-PaGIA test is a particle gel immunoassay that detects immunoglobulins (Ig) G, A and M specific to the heparin/PF4 complexes.
Other: HIT-Ab(PF4-H) test
The HIT-Ab(PF4-H) test consist in the incubation of plasma samples with latex beads coated PF4/polyvinylsulfate complexes. After binding of the plasma antibodies a monoclonal antibody recognizing PF4/heparin complexes is added. In the presence of human anti-PF4/heparin antibodies, binding of the monoclonal antibody and subsequent agglutination of latex beads is inhibited. Inhibition of agglutination is quantified and reported in arbitrary units (U/ml). A value equal or higher than 1.0 u/ml may indicate the presence of HIT antibodies.
Other Names:
  • HIT-Ab(PF4-H) latex agglutination test

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Sensibility, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of HEP score for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)
Time Frame: during the ICU stay, i.e an average time of 10 days
during the ICU stay, i.e an average time of 10 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensibility, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the 4Ts score for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)
Time Frame: during the ICU stay, i.e an average time of 10 days
Sensibility, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the 4Ts score for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)
during the ICU stay, i.e an average time of 10 days
Sensibility, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the particul gel immunoassay ID-PaGia test for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)
Time Frame: during the ICU stay, i.e an average time of 10 days
Sensibility, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the particul gel immunoassay ID-PaGia test for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)
during the ICU stay, i.e an average time of 10 days
Sensibility, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the automated immunoassay HemosIL-Ab latex agglutination test for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)
Time Frame: during the ICU stay, i.e an average time of 10 days
Sensibility, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the automated immunoassay HemosIL-Ab latex agglutination test for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)
during the ICU stay, i.e an average time of 10 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Marc Ginet, MD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 1, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 31, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 30, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 29, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TIH-2012

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings