Changes in the Tear Film With Scleral Contact Lens Wear for Keratoconic Eyes

June 25, 2019 updated by: Luigina Sorbara, University of Waterloo

Protease and Cytokine Composition in Post Lens Tear Reservoir of Scleral Lenses for Keratoconic Eyes

The purpose of this study is to investigate changes in the level of inflammatory mediators in the tear film of scleral contact lens wearers in a keratoconic population.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Scleral contact lenses are rigid gas permeable lenses designed to rest on the sclera while vaulting over the cornea with a fluid reservoir. The use of scleral contact lenses has become the current standard of practice as a nonsurgical management of corneal ectasia and ocular surface diseases. Cases have been recently presented of scleral lens wearers exhibiting adverse corneal findings and conjunctival injection from lens wear. These findings are likely associated with the mechanical and hypoxic effects due to poor fitting characteristics at the limbal area. Tear film analysis detecting changes in the levels of proteinases and cytokines have helped researchers gain a better understanding of the pathophysiology of complications in soft contact lenses wearers, dry eye, and keratoconus. Ultimately, this study will provide insights in relating scleral lens fitting characteristics and corneal and limbal physiological responses.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
13

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Had been diagnosed with keratoconus in at least one eye.
  • Is at least 18 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer.
  • Has read and understood the information consent letter.
  • Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Is using any topical medications that will affect ocular health.
  • Has any ocular pathology or severe insufficiency of lacrimal secretion (severe dry eyes) that would affect the wearing of contact lenses.
  • Has persistent, clinically significant corneal or conjunctival staining using sodium fluorescein dye.
  • Has any clinically significant lid or conjunctival abnormalities and active neovascularization.
  • Is aphakic.
  • Has undergone any corneal surgery.
  • Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.
  • Has any known allergies or sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals or products, such as fluorescein, used in this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: ZenLens with Low limbal clearance
Scleral contact lens designed to provide approximately 25 microns of limbal clearance.
Device: ZenLens
The ZenLens™ semi-scleral lenses are manufactured by Alden Optic Laboratories Inc., Lancaster, NY. They will be made in Boston XO material.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: ZenLens with High limbal clearance
Scleral contact lens designed to provide approximately 80 microns of limbal clearance.
Device: ZenLens
The ZenLens™ semi-scleral lenses are manufactured by Alden Optic Laboratories Inc., Lancaster, NY. They will be made in Boston XO material.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tear Protein
Time Frame: 2 weeks of lens wear with daily schedule of 6-8 hours.
To measure the level proteases and cytokines in each of the samples using Meso Scale Discovery system (MSD-ECL).
2 weeks of lens wear with daily schedule of 6-8 hours.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comfort
Time Frame: 2 weeks of lens wear with daily schedule of 6-8 hours.
Participants will be asked to rate their ocular comfort, dryness, burning and vision with the contact lenses.
2 weeks of lens wear with daily schedule of 6-8 hours.
Bulbar and limbal hyperemia
Time Frame: 2 weeks of lens wear with daily schedule of 6-8 hours.
The eyes of the participants will be imaged using the Keratograph® 5.
2 weeks of lens wear with daily schedule of 6-8 hours.
Corneal thickness
Time Frame: 2 weeks of lens wear with daily schedule of 6-8 hours.
Their corneal thickness will be measured with the Visante OCT.
2 weeks of lens wear with daily schedule of 6-8 hours.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Waterloo

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 30, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 15, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 16, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 16, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 27, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 25, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 14620

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings