The Comparison of Conventional and Advanced Bipolar Energy Modalities During Laparoscopic Staging Surgery of Gynecologic Cancers
The Impact of Bipolar Energy Modalities on Peri-operative Outcome During Laparoscopic Staging Surgery of Gynecologic Cancers: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ankara, Turkey, 06100
- Ankara University Medical Faculty Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pathologic diagnosis of endometrial or cervix cancer
- Stage I, IB1, IIA1 cervix cancer or patients with partial or complete response to chemoradiotherapy
- Clinically stage I and II endometrial cancer
Exclusion Criteria:
- Hematologic abnormality
- Coagulation disorder
- Present or past thromboembolic disease
- ECOG performance >2
- Advanced stage disease
- Fertility preserving surgery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Advanced bipolar (Ligasure-Covidien)
Devices with advanced bipolar energy (Ligasure-Covidien) will be used during laparoscopic hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy
|
Vessel sealing device Ligasure-Covidien used during laparoscopic hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional bipolar (RoBi forceps-Karl Storz)
Devices with conventional bipolar energy (RoBi rotating bipolar forceps-Karl Storz) will be used during laparoscopic hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy
|
Vessel sealing device RoBi forceps-Karl Storz used during laparoscopic hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Duration of operation
Time Frame: six months
|
six months
|
|
Perioperative complications
Time Frame: six months
|
six months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Pain measured by Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: Postoperative pain scores at 8th and 24th hours
|
Postoperative pain scores at 8th and 24th hours
|
|
Total cost of hospitalization, operation and complications
Time Frame: six months
|
six months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 03
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.