Enhanced Perioperative Mobilization (EPM) Trial (EPMIII)

October 19, 2017 updated by: Technische Universität Dresden

Usage of Activity Tracking in Major Visceral Surgery - the Enhanced Perioperative Mobilization (EPM) Trial

Randomized Controlled Trial to monitor and increase the postoperative mobilization of the patients undergoing major visceral surgery by giving a continuous autofeedback of the step count using activity tracking wristbands.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients undergoing elective open and laparoscopic surgery of colon, rectum, stomach, pancreas and liver for any indication will be included. Further inclusion criteria are: age between 18-75 years, ASA score < 4, and a signed informed consent. Patients are stratified into two subgroups (laparoscopic and open surgery) and will be randomized 1:1 for an autofeedback of their step-count using an activity tracker wristband or for the control group without autofeedback. Sample size (n = 29 patients in each of the four groups, overall n = 119) is calculated on an assumed difference in step-count of 250 steps daily (intervention versus control group). The primary study endpoint is the step-count during the first five postoperative days; secondary endpoints are the percentage of patients in the two groups, who master the predefined mobilization (step-count) targets, the assessment of additional activity data from the devices, the assessment of the preoperative mobility, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, number of patients who receive physiotherapy, 30-day mortality, and the overall 30-day morbidity.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
110

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Dresden, Germany, 01309
        • Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • elective laparoscopic and open surgery of the colon and rectum (colectomy, hemicolectomy, segment resection, rectum extirpation, deep anterior rectum resection, sigmoid resection, proctocolectomy), of the stomach (total, subtotal and atypical gastric resections), of the pancreas (any kind of pancreatic resections), and of the liver (hemihepatectomy, atypical resection, anatomical segment resection)
  • ASA score < IV
  • completed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • emergency surgery
  • mental inability to complete postoperative assessment protocols
  • preoperatively immobile patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Laparoscopic surgery, control
The control group is wearing an activity tracker wristband with covered display, so that the step count can't be read out.
Active Comparator: Laparoscopic surgery, intervention
activity tracking for autofeedback
Device: activity tracking for autofeedback
The intervention group receives an unblinded wristband. The handling of the activity trackers is explained to the patients and a predefined mobilization end-point (step-count) for the first five PODs is targeted. The target step-count was set at the 85% quartile obtained from a previous pilot study. The patients are assessed and monitored two times daily between 9 and 11 o'clock AM and between 3 and 5 o'clock PM by a surgical fellow or a study nurse throughout their hospital stay for read-out of the step count, assurance of the proper use and functioning, and for communication of the autofeedback.
No Intervention: Open surgery, control
The control group is wearing an activity tracker wristband with covered display, so that the step count can't be read out.
Active Comparator: Open surgery, intervention
activity tracking for autofeedback
Device: activity tracking for autofeedback
The intervention group receives an unblinded wristband. The handling of the activity trackers is explained to the patients and a predefined mobilization end-point (step-count) for the first five PODs is targeted. The target step-count was set at the 85% quartile obtained from a previous pilot study. The patients are assessed and monitored two times daily between 9 and 11 o'clock AM and between 3 and 5 o'clock PM by a surgical fellow or a study nurse throughout their hospital stay for read-out of the step count, assurance of the proper use and functioning, and for communication of the autofeedback.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Median Step count
Time Frame: First to fifth postoperative day
First to fifth postoperative day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Length of ICU stay
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Percentage of patients, who master the predefined mobilization (step-count) targets
Time Frame: First to fifth postoperative day
First to fifth postoperative day
Distance (km)
Time Frame: First to fifth postoperative day
Assessed by the activity tracker wristband
First to fifth postoperative day
Activity time (min.)
Time Frame: First to fifth postoperative day
Assessed by the activity tracker wristband
First to fifth postoperative day
inactivity
Time Frame: First to fifth postoperative day
Assessed by the activity tracker wristband
First to fifth postoperative day
calorie consumption (kcal)
Time Frame: First to fifth postoperative day
Assessed by the activity tracker wristband
First to fifth postoperative day
Compliance
Time Frame: First to fifth postoperative day
Compliance to wear the wrist band
First to fifth postoperative day
Assessment of the preoperative mobility
Time Frame: Preoperative
Measured by International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
Preoperative
Amount of patients which receive physiotherapy
Time Frame: First to fifth postoperative day
First to fifth postoperative day
Overall morbidity
Time Frame: 30 days
According the Clavien-Dindo classification
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Technische Universität Dresden

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Thilo Welsch, MD, MBA, Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Germany

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 26, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 20, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 20, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 15, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 12, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 20, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 19, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TW-003

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings