Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation on Sensory Perceptions of Chronic Pain Patients
It's well known that Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) changes the perception of chronic pain in the area stimulated by epidural electrodes. However, we don't know the effect of this type of stimulation on the perception of external sensations (temperature, touch, pressure, and vibration) and sharp pain. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is used to quantify somatosensory phenotype. This QST battery tests different subtypes of nerve fibres (Aβ, Aδ and C) involved in the transduction of sensory information from the periphery to the spinal cord.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of the SCS on sensory perceptions of patients with chronic pain (CRPS, FBSS). Sensorial perception tests will be carried out in accordance with a standardized procedure (Rolke et al. Pain, 2006). For non-implanted patients, an initial visit will be conducted before the operation. For all participants, two other visits will take place at least 6 months after the operation to perform the tests with and without stimulation.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a reversible and minimally invasive neuromodulation technique employs for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain. Even if SCS is an established technology for the management of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), its impacts on the sensory perception system remain misunderstood.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of the SCS on sensory perceptions of patients with chronic pain (CRPS, FBSS). Sensorial perception tests will be carried out in accordance with a standardized procedure (Rolke et al. Pain, 2006) at the level of maximum pain area (painful leg), and at two non-painful areas (contralateral leg and ipsilateral arm). The thermode "Thermal Sensory Analyser TSA-II NeuroSensory Analyzer" and its complement "Vibratory Sensory Analyzer VSA-3000" (Medoc) will be used to assess warm, cold and vibratory detection thresholds, as well as heat and cold painful thresholds. Von Frey monofilaments (Bioseb) will be used to evaluate the mechanical detection threshold. The algometer "Force Ten ™ FDX Digital" (Wagner) will measure the pressure pain threshold. Dynamic mechanical allodynia will be assessed with a standardized brush (SENSELab Brush-05, Somedic). The Neuropen (Owen Mumford) will be used to test the temporal pain summation. Participants will be recruited through the neuromodulation clinic located in Enfant-Jésus Hospital (Québec, Canada).
For non-implanted patients, an initial visit will be conducted before the operation. For all participants, two other visits will take place at least 6 months after the operation to perform the tests with and without stimulation (the order of these visits will be randomized).
For each test, an average of the absolute differences (with-without stimulation) and its confidence interval will be calculated. The results will be considered significant with p values inferior to 0,05. All analyzes will be performed with SAS (SAS 9.3 Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA).
The protocol was peer reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Enfant-Jésus Hospital. All subjects will participate after written informed consent.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Québec, Canada, G1J 1Z4
- CHU de Québec - Université Laval
-
-
-
-
Ohio
-
Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43614
- University of Toledo Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participant with a diagnosis of CRPS or FBSS that meet International Association for the Study of Pain's criteria;
- Pain in one leg;
- Paresthesia area limited to the treated leg;
- No changes in the programming patterns of the device for a minimum of 30 days before the tests;
- Informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Wounds or infections at the painful site.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: OTHER
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
- Masking: DOUBLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Stimulation Off
Patients receiving the intervention "implantation with a spinal cord stimulator".
The system is turn Off during the experiment.
|
Spinal cord stimulator is a reversible and minimally invasive neuromodulation device used for the treatment of various diseases related to chronic pain, including CRPS and FBSS.
Briefly, this technology uses electrical pulses to generate action potentials in nerve cells that induce paresthesias (buzzing or tingling sensations) in the affected limb and can relieve pain.
Other Names:
The electrical pulses are induced by one or more electrodes surgically implanted into the epidural space.
These electrodes are usually placed under the skin in the abdomen or upper buttock.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Stimulation On
Patients receiving the intervention "implantation with a spinal cord stimulator".
The system is turn On during the experiment.
|
Spinal cord stimulator is a reversible and minimally invasive neuromodulation device used for the treatment of various diseases related to chronic pain, including CRPS and FBSS.
Briefly, this technology uses electrical pulses to generate action potentials in nerve cells that induce paresthesias (buzzing or tingling sensations) in the affected limb and can relieve pain.
Other Names:
The electrical pulses are induced by one or more electrodes surgically implanted into the epidural space.
These electrodes are usually placed under the skin in the abdomen or upper buttock.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in sensory thresholds
Time Frame: Baseline and at least 6 months post-implantation
|
Sensorial perception tests will be carried out in accordance with a standardized procedure (Rolke et al.
Pain, 2006).
The thermode "Thermal Sensory Analyser TSA-II NeuroSensory Analyzer" and its complement "Vibratory Sensory Analyzer VSA-3000" (Medoc) will be used to assess warm, cold and vibratory detection thresholds, as well as heat and cold painful thresholds.
Von Frey monofilaments (Bioseb) will be used to evaluate the mechanical detection threshold.
The algometer "Force Ten ™ FDX Digital" (Wagner) will measure the pressure pain threshold.
Dynamic mechanical allodynia will be assessed with a standardized brush (SENSELab Brush-05, Somedic).
The Neuropen (Owen Mumford) will be used to test the temporal pain summation.
|
Baseline and at least 6 months post-implantation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michel Prud'Homme, MD, PhD, CHU de Québec - Université Laval
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Nervous System Diseases
- Postoperative Complications
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Disease
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
- Autonomic Nervous System Diseases
- Back Pain
- Syndrome
- Chronic Pain
- Complex Regional Pain Syndromes
- Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy
- Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2015-2072
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.