A Study to Evaluate the Effect of IV Doses of Rivipansel in Subjects With Moderate Hepatic Impairment and in Healthy Subjects With Normal Hepatic Function

June 25, 2020 updated by: GlycoMimetics Incorporated

A Phase 1, Non-randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group Single-dose Study To Evaluate The Pharmacokinetics, Safety, And Tolerability Of Intravenous Rivipansel (Pf-06460031) In Subjects With Moderate Hepatic Impairment And In Healthy Subjects With Normal Hepatic Function

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of hepatic impairment on rivipansel PK and safety.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
16

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32809
        • Orlando Clincial Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female subjects of non-childbearing potential or male subjects

    • Body Mass Index (BMI) of 17.5 to 40.0 kg/m2
    • Normal Hepatic function for the healthy subjects
    • Stable Hepatic Impairment for the subjects with moderate hepatic impairment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days of the dose of study medication
  • Pregnant females, breastfeeding female subjects and male subjects with partners currently pregnant
  • Use of herbal supplements in the 28 days prior to the dose of study medication
  • Blood donation (excluding plasma donation) of approximately 1 pint or more within 56 days prior to study medication
  • A positive urine drug screen for illicit drugs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Moderate Hepatic Impairment
A single dose of IV Rivipansel over 20 minutes
Drug: Rivipansel
A single dose of IV Rivipansel over 20 minutes
Other Names:
  • GMI-1070
Experimental: Normal Hepatic Function
A single dose of IV Rivipansel over 20 minutes
Drug: Rivipansel
A single dose of IV Rivipansel over 20 minutes
Other Names:
  • GMI-1070

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Post-baseline Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examinations
Time Frame: Day 5
A full physical examination was performed for each participant, and it included head, ears, eyes, nose, mouth, skin, heart and lung examinations, lymph nodes and gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and neurological systems. Clinical significance of laboratory findings was determined by the investigator.
Day 5
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: Day 1 to follow-up visit (28-31 days after administration of study medication on Day 1)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device, regardless of its causal relationship with study treatment. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were events between administration of study medication and up to follow-up visit (28-31 days after administration) that were absent before treatment or that worsened after treatment. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs.
Day 1 to follow-up visit (28-31 days after administration of study medication on Day 1)
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting Pre-defined Summarization Criteria
Time Frame: Day 5
Maximum absolute values and increases from baseline were summarized for PR interval (time from the beginning of P wave to the start of QRS complex, corresponding to the end of atrial depolarization and onset of ventricular depolarization), QRS duration (time from Q wave to the end of S wave, corresponding to ventricle depolarization), and QTcF interval (time from the beginning of Q wave to the end of T wave corresponding to electrical systole corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula). Number of participants with ECG findings meeting the following criteria is presented: (1) PR interval >=300 msec; (2) QRS duration >=200 msec; (3) QTcF interval: 450 to <480 msec; (4) QTcF interval: 480 to <500 msec; (5) QTcF interval >=500 msec; (6) PR interval percent increase from baseline >=25/50 percent; (7) QRS duration percent increase from baseline >=50 percent; (8) QTcF interval increase from baseline: 30 to <60 msec; (9) QTcF interval increase from baseline >=60 msec.
Day 5
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Meeting Pre-defined Summarization Criteria
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 5
Absolute values and changes from baseline (increase and decrease) were summarized for supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP), supine systolic blood pressure (SBP), and supine pulse rate. Number of participants with vital signs findings meeting the following criteria is presented: (1) supine DBP <50 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg); (2) supine DBP >90 mm Hg; (3) supine SBP <90 mm Hg; (4) supine SBP >140 mm Hg (for normal hepatic function group); (5) supine SBP >160 mm Hg (for moderate hepatic impairment group); (6) supine pulse rate < 40 beats per minute (bpm); (7) supine pulse rate >120 bpm; (8) supine DBP increase from baseline >=20 mm Hg; (9) supine SBP increase from baseline >=30 mmHg; (10) supine DBP decrease from baseline >=20 mm Hg; (11) supine SBP decrease from baseline >=30 mm Hg.
Day 1 to Day 5
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)
Time Frame: Day 5
Laboratory tests included: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red and white blood cell count, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils, lymphocytes, prothrombin time/international normalized ratio), chemistry (blood urea nitrogen/urea and creatinine, fasting glucose, calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, total carbon dioxide, aspartate and alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, uric acid, albumin, total protein), urinalysis (pH, qualitative glucose, protein, and blood, ketones, nitrites, leukocyte esterase, urobilinogen, urine bilirubin, and microscopy), and other tests (follicle stimulating hormone, urine drug test and serologic tests on human immunodeficiency virus-1 antibody, Hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis C antibody). Abnormality was determined by the investigator using widely accepted criteria in clinical practice.
Day 5
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Rivipansel
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1
AUCinf was calculated as AUClast + (Clast*/kel), where Clast* was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log linear regression analysis, kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve.
Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1
Total Clearance From Plasma (CL) of Rivipansel
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1
CL of rivipansel was calculated as dose/AUCinf, where AUCinf referred to the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to the infinite time.
Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Rivipansel
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1
Area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) of rivipansel was determined using a linear/log trapezoidal method.
Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Rivipansel
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1
Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1
Terminal Half-Life of Rivipansel
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1
Terminal half-life of rivipansel was calculated as loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration time curve.
Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Rivipansel
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1
Vss of rivipansel was calculated as CL*MRT, where MRT was the mean residence time and CL was the clearance from plasma.
Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time for Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Rivipansel
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1
Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
GlycoMimetics Incorporated

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 15, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 17, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 18, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 25, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • B5201006

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings