The Educational Effectiveness for Atrial Fibrillation Patients Under Warfarin Treatment
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation by a physician and taking Warfarin as treatment
- 20 years old or older
- clear consciousness for communication
- willingness to participate in research
Exclusion Criteria:
- can not communicate clearly
- without willingness to participate in research
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: education group
In education group, each subject in the experimental group was taught individually according to investigator's brochure in the outpatient department by researchers.
Three months later, participants in the education group received a follow-up phone call in order to clarify any questions related to the brochure.
All participants completed posttest at 6-month follow-up.
|
Patient education related Warfarin: each subject in the experimental group was taught individually according to investigator's brochure in the outpatient department (OPD) by researchers.
Three months later, participants received a follow-up phone call in order to clarify any questions related to the brochure.
The contents of the brochure consisted of: the purpose of taking Warfarin, side effects, adjustments to daily diet, and precautions (i.e.
how to take medication safely, interaction between foods and medicine, prevention and checking of signs and symptoms of bleeding).
The control group received the brochure after pretest and routine care only in the OPD.
All participants completed posttest at 6-month follow-up.
|
|
No Intervention: control group
The control group received the brochure only.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
knowledge of Warfarin
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
|
There were six questions and the contents were consistent with investigator's brochure used in investigator's research setting.
When participants answered questions correctly, or illustrated at least two correct examples for each item, participants received one point; otherwise, participants received no point.
The range of scores was 0-6.
The higher the score, the better the patient's knowledge of Warfarin was.
|
6-month follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
life distress
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
|
There were six questions.
The most commonly cited things patients suffered from while under Warfarin treatment were included.
When participants answered "yes", participants received one point; if participants answered "no", participants received no point.
The range of scores was 0-6.
A higher score indicated a worse life distresses.
|
6-month follow-up
|
|
quality of life
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
|
Investigators use SF-36 to measure participants' quality of life.The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, including vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health,which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section.
Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight.
The lower the score the more disability.
The higher the score the less disability.
|
6-month follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: YU-HSIA TSAI, MS,RN, Chang Gung University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Pernod G, Labarere J, Yver J, Satger B, Allenet B, Berremili T, Fontaine M, Franco G, Bosson JL. EDUC'AVK: reduction of oral anticoagulant-related adverse events after patient education: a prospective multicenter open randomized study. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Sep;23(9):1441-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0690-1. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
- Wofford JL, Wells MD, Singh S. Best strategies for patient education about anticoagulation with warfarin: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb 14;8:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-40.
- Casais P, Meschengieser SS, Sanchez-Luceros A, Lazzari MA. Patients' perceptions regarding oral anticoagulation therapy and its effect on quality of life. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Jul;21(7):1085-90. doi: 10.1185/030079905X50624.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 98-3227B
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.