Optimizing Fall-risk Prediction in Older Adults With Cancer

October 13, 2020 updated by: Washington University School of Medicine
To establish the optimal strategy of fall-risk assessment to predict falls in older adults receiving cancer therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
227

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Older adults receiving systemic therapy at Siteman Cancer Center

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥65
  • Receiving systemic cancer therapy, including conventional chemotherapy, novel/targeted agents or hormonal agents (e.g. anti-estrogen or anti-androgen) OR will begin systemic therapy within the next 4 weeks.
  • Estimated life expectancy >1 year
  • Anticipated to receive ongoing care at Siteman Cancer Center and its satellite sites
  • Able to understand and willing to sign an IRB-approved written informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to read and understand English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Fall Risk Assessment Group
-Participants will complete baseline primarily self-administered cancer-specific geriatric assessments and measures of neuropathy and pain, an abbreviated geriatric assessment with each follow-up clinic visit (generally every 3-4 weeks in patients receiving systemic therapy) for 6-months of follow-up and a final end-of-study assessment.
Other: Baseline Participant Assessment
  • Section 1 contains demographic questions
  • Section 2 contains daily activity questions with multiple choice answers, multiple physical function questions, and if the participants has fallen and how many falls have occurred in the last 6 months
  • Section 3 has the participant list all medication
  • Section 4 contains several questions about participant health (lists of illnesses and indicate if illness interferes with their activities)
  • Section 5 contains several questions about participant fall concerns with answers ranging from 1=Not at all to 4=Very
  • Section 6 contains multiple questions asking about emotional distress/depression, fatigue, pain interference, pain intensity, and numbness and tingling
Other: Baseline Healthcare Provider Assessment
  • Cognition: Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test which contains 6 questions that the provider will ask the participant. Form items 1-3, the response is either correct (score 0) or incorrect (score 1). For items 4-6, subtract one point for each error. Total score of 11 or greater indicates cognitive impairment (maximum score =28)
  • Trail Making Test Part B - consists of 25 circles distributed over a sheet of paper. The circles include both numbers and letters; the participants draws lines to connect the circles in an ascending pattern, but with the added task of alternating between the numbers and letter. The test is timed.
  • Timed "Up and "Go - the provider measures the time in seconds it takes for the participant to stand up from a standard arm chair, walk a distance of 3 meters, turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down again.
Other: Follow-up Participant Assessment
  • Section 1 contains multiple choice questions about daily actives and several physical function questions
  • Section 2 asks the participants how many medications they take on a daily basis, indicate any medication for depression, anxiety, nausea , and other stomach conditions
  • Section 3 contains multiple questions asking about emotional distress/depression, fatigue, pain interference, pain intensity, and numbness and tingling
Other: Follow-up Healthcare Provider Assessment
  • Trail Making Test Part B - consists of 25 circles distributed over a sheet of paper. The circles include both numbers and letters; the participants draws lines to connect the circles in an ascending pattern, but with the added task of alternating between the numbers and letter. The test is timed.
  • Timed "Up and "Go - the provider measures the time in seconds it takes for the participant to stand up from a standard arm chair, walk a distance of 3 meters, turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down again.
Other: End-of-study Participant Assessment
  • Section 1 contains multiple choice questions about daily actives and several physical function questions
  • Section 2 asks the participants how many medications they take on a daily basis, indicate any medication for depression, anxiety, nausea , and other stomach conditions
  • Section 3 contains multiple questions about the participant's concern about falling with answers ranging from 1=Not at all to 4=Very
  • Section 4 contains multiple questions asking about emotional distress/depression, fatigue, pain interference, pain intensity, and numbness and tingling
Other: End-of-study Healthcare Provider Assessment
  • Cognition: Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test which contains 6 questions that the provider will ask the participant. Form items 1-3, the response is either correct (score 0) or incorrect (score 1). For items 4-6, subtract one point for each error. Total score of 11 or greater indicates cognitive impairment (maximum score =28)
  • Trail Making Test Part B - consists of 25 circles distributed over a sheet of paper. The circles include both numbers and letters; the participants draws lines to connect the circles in an ascending pattern, but with the added task of alternating between the numbers and letter. The test is timed.
  • Timed "Up and "Go - the provider measures the time in seconds it takes for the participant to stand up from a standard arm chair, walk a distance of 3 meters, turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down again.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of falls
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
-The Prevention of Falls Network Europe (PROFANE) Consensus Group guidelines will be used
Up to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Up to 6 months
Time to fall event
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Up to 6 months
Number of falls that were considered injurious falls
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Up to 6 months
Fear of falling as Measured by the Falls Efficacy Scale-International
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
measures the level of concern about falling during social and physical activities inside and outside the home whether or not the person actually does the activity. The level of concern is measured on a four point Likert scale (1=not at all concerned to 4=very concerned)
Up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Washington University School of Medicine

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Katherine Clifton, M.D., Washington University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 12, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 9, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 9, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 23, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 13, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 201609049

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings