Predictive Analytics for Theranosis in RA (PAnTheRA)

February 6, 2019 updated by: DNAlytics

Prediction of the Response to Anti-TNFs DMARDs Based on the RheumaKit ® Platform (RK-Tx-01)

RA is the most common inflammatory, persistent and progressive disease of the joints with serious co-morbidities and huge health and socio-economic impact worldwide.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The current standard therapeutic strategy for RA patients is to initiate a DMARDs therapy, (e.g. MTX) with serious side effects. This also applies to some PSO or SNSA patients. MTX is however inefficient in about 40% of the cases. Other treatments (biological DMARDs) must thus be initiated, which have an overall similar effectiveness and side effects and an higher cost (around 13kEUR/year/patient). Therapeutic choices are based on symptoms and blood tests including markers of inflammation which are inadequate to predict disease evolution and response to treatments. Improving RA management requires to improve the adequacy of the therapeutic strategies. The earlier the disease is correctly addressed, the more likely its progression and irreversible damages to the joints will be limited. DNAlytics recently developed RheumaKit a differential diagnostic solution for UA patients. UA is a condition in which joint inflammation is present, but a precise diagnosis cannot be made, due to the lack of sensitivity of presently available diagnostic techniques. RheumaKit is a multi-gene expression solution that discriminates RA from other joint conditions. A diagnostic model train to identify patients suffering from RA, SNSA or OA. RheumaKit diagnostic accuracy is higher than 90%, a performance that is better than any other diagnostic solution designed until now, including the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria for the diagnosis of RA. See working principle below. Beyond diagnosis, DNAlytics wants to make RheumaKit evolve towards treatment recommendation applications (theranostic applications) for patients eligible for biological DMARDs. On one hand, the diseases of these patients have been more and more described in terms of the activity of several metabolic pathways (T & B cells activation, Extra cellular matrix, Inteferon, TNF). On the other hand, the existing treatments also have been more and more described in terms of the pathways they target. The RheumaKit signature contains many markers that are representative of these pathways of interest. RheumaKit thus now provides a snapshot of the activity of seven metabolic pathways known from literature to be related to diseases mechanisms, or to be target of existing treatments. In this study, DNAlytics wants to show that based on a score defined on the RheumaKit platform, the response or non- response to anti-TNFs, representing the largest category of biological DMARDs, can be predicted before treatment initiation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
110

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Bruxelles, Belgium, 1000
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Saint-Pierre
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Laurent Méric de Bellfon, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Silvana Di Romana, MD
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • Recruiting
        • UZLeuven, Gasthuisberg
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rene Westhovens, MD, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Patrick Verschueren, MD, PhD
      • Liège, Belgium
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Liège
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michel Malaise, MD, PhD
    • Bruxelles-capital
      • Brussels, Bruxelles-capital, Belgium, 1200
        • Recruiting
        • Clinique Universitaires Saint-Luc
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Patrick Durez, MD, PhD
  • Spain
    • Catalunia
      • Sabadell, Catalunia, Spain, 08208
        • Recruiting
        • Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Eduard Graell, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Antonio D Gomez, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients must satisfy all of the following criteria:

  • Signed the ICF and covered by health insurance.
  • At least 18 years old.
  • For women, use of a reliable method of birth control or remain abstinent during the study, or have had surgical sterilization or women above 60 years of age.
  • Having undergone at least 3 months of synthetic DMARD treatment while being strictly eligible for it (diagnosed with RA) and being at a stable dose at least for the last month, and showing no satisfactory response to this therapy.
  • Be eligible for biological DMARD treatment according to local regulation and practice.
  • Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, tests and other protocol procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients must satisfy none of the following criteria:

  • Arthritis history longer than 5 years.
  • Biological DMARD therapy already initiated.
  • Be diagnosed with septic arthritis.
  • Be pregnant or breastfeeding/lactating women.
  • Diagnosed with HIV, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, Crohn's disease, fibromyalgia.
  • Diagnosed with other inflammatory arthritic syndrome than RA.
  • have a chronic pain condition that would confound evaluation of the patient.
  • Be identified as at too high risk for biopsy or for biologic therapy.
  • Be identified as having psychological, familial, social or geographical conditions which could potentially hamper compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: All patients
All eligible patients
Other: RheumaKit: Prediction of the response to anti-TNFs DMARDs

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ability of a score
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
To show the ability of a score, computed prior to treatment initiation, to be predictive of the individual anti-TNF response. The score is based on the RheumaKit transcriptomic profiles from a set of small synovial biopsies from a given joint also harvested before anti-TNF treatment initiation.
Up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identify additional/alternative mappings
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
To identify additional/alternative mappings between components of gene expression profiles obtained via the RheumaKit assay (extended, and possibly combined to clinical and biological information) and efficacy of anti-TNFs biological DMARDs.
Up to 12 months
Validate the sample logistics at an international scale.
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
To validate the feasibility of the implementation of a molecular biology test in rheumatology based on synovial tissue at an international scale. This covers both logistics and patient agreeableness aspects.
Up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
DNAlytics

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Patrick Durez, MD, PhD, Clinique Universitaire Saint-Luc

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 6, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 10, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 6, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RK-Tx-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings