Effects of Different Area of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling (ILM) Peeling on Anatomical Outcomes in Macular Hole Surgery
A Randomized, Comparative, Prospective Study of Anatomical Outcomes With Different Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Area in Surgery for Idiopathic Macular Hole
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients with IMH
- patients signed the informed consent form (ICF)
- patients with course of IMH less than 3 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients with hyper myopia
- patients with traumatic macular hole
- accompanied or secondary of other fundus disease
- open or reopen after receiving MH surgery
- patients with retinal detachment
- received vitrectomy due to other diseases
- glaucoma cannot be controled by medication
- patients with other retinal or choroidal disease that may affect VA
- poor patients compliance
- poor condition that cannot undertake the surgery
- dioptric media opacities which make it difficult to exam fundus or measure on OCT
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 4PD diameter of ILM peeling in surgery
patients in this group was given 4papillary diameter (PD) diameter of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in surgery
|
4PD or 2PD diameter of ILM peeling in surgery was given to patients with idiopathic macular hole (IMH)
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: 2PD diameter of ILM peeling in surgery
patients in this group was given 2PD diameter of ILM peeling in surgery
|
4PD or 2PD diameter of ILM peeling in surgery was given to patients with idiopathic macular hole (IMH)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Anatomical closure grades in OCT
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Change of anatomical closure grades in OCT
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
|
3 months, 6 months, 1 year
|
|
Change from baseline in BCVA (best corrected visual acuity)
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
|
3 months, 6 months, 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- DAILMP-CHINA
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.