Xylitol for Otitis Media

December 20, 2017 updated by: Duke University

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Pilot Study for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Intranasal Xylitol in Treating Otitis Media With Effusion (OME) in Children

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of children, age 6 months to 3 years, with a diagnosis of Otis media with effusion (OME) based on examination by a provider at a Duke- affiliated otolaryngology clinic.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of intranasal xylitol in young children with otitis media with effusion as measured by the resolution of middle ear effusion based on physical examination and tympanometry at 6-, 12-, and 18 and 24-weeks post-treatment. Eligible subjects will be randomly assigned to receive either intranasal xylitol spray or a nasal saline spray placebo and will be observed for 24-weeks following initiation of daily xylitol spray or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint, the time to middle ear effusion resolution with and without the xylitol nasal spray, will be analyzed using either a two-sample t-test or non-parametric Wilcoxon test, depending on whether the time is normal or non-normal. Risks include epistaxis, diarrhea, and allergic reaction. Serious adverse events are not anticipated.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 9 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 6 months and 3 years of age.
  • Clinical diagnosis of OME. Treated at Duke for the above condition.
  • Ability of parent/guardian to be compliant with at-home nasal spray administration.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of immunodeficiency or an immunologic disorder that predisposes to frequent infections.
  • History of prior pressure-equalization (PE) tube placement and the tubes are still in place.
  • Active or recent (<1 month prior to screening) middle ear disease, including but not limited to: cholesteatoma, tympanic membrane perforation, congenital external or middle ear abnormalities or malformations.
  • History of previous otologic surgery including tympanoplasty, and/or mastoidectomy.
  • Previous use of intranasal sprays other than normal saline, including intranasal steroids, and/or xylitol within 1 month prior to screening.
  • Any other clinically significant illness or medical condition, per PI discretion, that would prohibit the subject from participating in the study.
  • Subject has previously been randomized to a trial of Xylitol.
  • Parent/guardian is unable to administer the study nasal spray.
  • Parent/guardian is unable to read, write, and understand English.
  • Parent/guardian is unable to provide legally effective consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intranasal xylitol spray
Two sprays each nostril, twice a day.
Drug: Intranasal xylitol spray
Two sprays into each nostril of intranasal xylitol spray will be administered to pediatric patients by parent(s)/caregiver(s) twice daily for 24 weeks.
Placebo Comparator: Intranasal saline spray
Two sprays each nostril, twice a day.
Other: Intranasal saline spray
Two sprays into each nostril of intranasal xylitol spray will be administered to pediatric patients by parent(s)/caregiver(s) twice daily for 24 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Placebo spray

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time to middle ear effusion resolution
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the effect of intranasal xylitol on resolution of the conductive hearing loss associated with middle ear effusion
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Results from both audiometry and tympanometry testing are combined to have a comprehensive assessment of conductive hearing loss.
24 weeks
Effect of intranasal xylitol on frequency of episodes of acute otitis media and sinonasal symptoms
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Tolerability and side effects of intranasal xylitol administration in children
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Will be evaluated descriptively and include all subjects exposed to at least one dose of study drug
24 weeks
Tympanostomy tube (TT) placement need
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The number of subjects that need TT placement in each arm will be assessed.
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Duke University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Marissa Ryan, MD, Duke University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 20, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 20, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 20, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 19, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 28, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 20, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro00072658

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings