Improving Symptom Self-management in Adolescents & Young Adults With Cancer (CSCAT2)

December 20, 2017 updated by: Virginia Commonwealth University
This study evaluates the use of the Computerized Symptom Capture Tool (C-SCAT), which creates an image of the symptoms the participant is experiencing, for improving symptom self-management in adolescents and young adults with cancer. In this one-group trial, participants will complete the C-SCAT and use it during two clinic visits with their oncology providers.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Unrelieved symptoms lead to poorer quality of life for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer. Strategies are needed to help AYAs manage symptoms. The investigators developed the Computerized Symptom Capture Tool (C-SCAT), a novel way to assess symptoms where AYAs create a picture of their symptoms using images and text on an iPad app. The resulting image shows symptoms/symptom clusters, priority symptoms and relationships between symptoms and has potential to support AYA's symptom self-management. Facilitating the self-management process, including self-efficacy, self-regulation behaviors, and patient-provider communication, is essential for improving symptom outcomes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64108
        • The Childrens Mercy Hospital
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
        • Virginia Commonwealth University/Massey Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 29 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

pediatric and adult oncology clinics at the Virginia Commonwealth University Health System (VCUHS). Patients and parents of minor patients will be approached as inpatients or as outpatients at Massey Cancer Center Fellows Clinic and at the Pediatric Oncology Clinic.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 15 to 29 years of age with a diagnosis of cancer (primary, relapsed/recurrent, refractory, progressive, or secondary malignancy) receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
  • Completion of at least one cycle of therapy for cancer and anticipated to have at least two additional cycles of myelosuppressive chemotherapy as part of the treatment plan.
  • Ability to speak and understand English as required to complete the C-SCAT and study measures.
  • Ability to use a tablet computer.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive and/or physical inabilities to complete the proposed study measures as determined by self--report, parent report of minor, or medical chart.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
C-SCAT
C-SCAT arm: Completes and uses Computerized Symptom Capture Tool (C-SCAT) during visit with provider for two clinic visits.
Device: Computer Symptom Capture Tool
C-SCAT is an investigator developed app that is delivered via an iPad. The original CSCAT included the 30 symptoms from the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale. The recently updated version includes two additional symptoms "feeling bloated" and "sexual dysfunction" that are included in the adult version of the MSAS.21 These symptoms were added based on feedback from the initial AYA sample of 13-29 year olds and in consideration of the developmental perspectives of the AYA population.The CSCAT allows the user to create an image of his or her symptom experience.
Other Names:
  • C-SCAT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in self-efficacy of symptom management measured by PROMIS Self-efficacy of symptom management scale.
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after first provider visit (approx. 2 -4 weeks from baseline) and then immediately after second provider visit (approx. 6-8 weeks from baseline)
Baseline, immediately after first provider visit (approx. 2 -4 weeks from baseline) and then immediately after second provider visit (approx. 6-8 weeks from baseline)
Change in patient-provider communication from patient perspective measured by Patient-Provider Communication Scale.
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after first provider visit (approx. 2 -4 weeks from baseline) and then immediately after second provider visit (approx. 6-8 weeks from baseline)
Baseline, immediately after first provider visit (approx. 2 -4 weeks from baseline) and then immediately after second provider visit (approx. 6-8 weeks from baseline)
Change in self-regulation of symptoms assessed by an audio-taped semi-structured interview.
Time Frame: Within 24 hours after first provider visit (approx. 2 -4 weeks from baseline) and Within 24 hours after second provider visit (approx. 6-8 weeks from baseline)
Semi-structured interviews to address how using the C-SCAT impacts self-regulation behaviors, such as self-monitoring, reflective thinking, and decision-making
Within 24 hours after first provider visit (approx. 2 -4 weeks from baseline) and Within 24 hours after second provider visit (approx. 6-8 weeks from baseline)
Change in provider's usefulness of using C-SCAT assessed by Provider Questionnaire.
Time Frame: After first provider visit (approx. 2 -4 weeks from baseline) and after second provider visit (approx. 6-8 weeks from baseline)
After first provider visit (approx. 2 -4 weeks from baseline) and after second provider visit (approx. 6-8 weeks from baseline)
Change in provider's usefulness of using C-SCAT assessed by providers' documentation of symptoms in the electronic health record.
Time Frame: After first provider visit (approx. 2 -4 weeks from baseline) and after second provider visit (approx. 6-8 weeks from baseline)
After first provider visit (approx. 2 -4 weeks from baseline) and after second provider visit (approx. 6-8 weeks from baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Virginia Commonwealth University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
St. Baldrick's Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Suzanne W. Ameringer, Ph.D., Virginia Commonwealth University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 25, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 25, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 6, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 20, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MCC-16-12876
  • HM20007402 (Other Identifier: IRB)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings