Cryobiopsy Versus Forceps Biopsy for Pulmonary Lesions
An Un-blinded, Intra-patient Comparison of Transbronchial Forceps Biopsy and Cryobiopsy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- University of Pennsylvania
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age >/= 18
- At least one peripheral lung lesion >8mm documented on CT scan referred for diagnostic bronchoscopy
- Subject is able to undergo informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Coagulopathy (platelet count < 50,000, INR > 1.5) detected on blood testing done within 6 weeks of the procedural visit
- Lesion associated with a prominent vessel evident on CT scan
- Pure ground glass lesion
- Fibrotic interstitial lung abnormalities on chest CT
- Bullous emphysema in region of nodule
- Supplemental oxygen utilization at baseline
- BMI > 40
- End stage renal disease
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Single intervention arm - transbronchial biopsy
Patients enrolled in this single arm study will have lung nodules biopsied by traditional forceps followed by transbronchial cryobiopsy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The increase in sensitivity for diagnosing lung cancer with the addition of cryobiopsy to standard forceps biopsy for a suspicious lung nodule.
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Sensitivity for cancer is defined as true positives / (true positives + false negatives) with respect to diagnosing malignancy.
If the bronchoscopic procedure fails to diagnose malignancy, the gold standard will be the results of any further, more invasive testing that is clinically indicated to evaluate the nodule.
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The increase in sensitivity for diagnosing a specific benign lung disease with the addition of cryobiopsy to standard forceps biopsy for a suspicious lung nodule.
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Sensitivity is defined as true positives / (true positives + false negatives) with respect to diagnosing a specific benign condition that is thought to represent the lung nodule seen on CT scan.
If the bronchoscopic procedure fails to diagnose a specific benign condition, the gold standard will be the results of any further, more invasive testing and stable follow-up imaging at 1 year.
|
1 year
|
|
The number of participants with pneumothorax or significant bleeding related to the addition of transbronchial cryobiopsy to standard forceps biopsy.
Time Frame: 1 year
|
A chest X-ray and ultrasound will be done to check for pneumothorax after standard forceps biopsy and after the addition of transbronchial cryobiopsy.
Bleeding will be measured with a standardized scale (grade 0 = traces of blood not requiring suctioning; grade 1 = bleeding requiring suction to clear; grade 2 = bleeding requiring wedging of the biopsied segment with the flexible bronchoscope and/or iced saline/epinephrine; grade 3 = bleeding requiring further intervention such as balloon occlusion or inflation of the bronchial blocker; grade 4 = bleeding resulting in airway obstruction and acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, cardiopulmonary instability, transfusion of packed RBCs, and/or admission to the ICU) both after forceps biopsy and again after transbronchial cryobiopsy.
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David M DiBardino, MD, University of Pennslyvania
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB # 825506
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.