Liver Ablative Radiotherapy Utilising Kilovoltage Intrafraction Monitoring (KIM) (TROG1703 LARK)
LARK: Liver Ablative Radiotherapy Utilising Kilovoltage Intrafraction Monitoring (KIM)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Doan Trial Coordinator
- Phone Number: +61 2 8627 1185
- Email: Shona.Silvester@sydney.edu.au
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Research Associate
- Phone Number: +61 2 8627 1185
- Email: Chandrima.Sengupta@sydney.edu.au
Study Locations
-
-
New South Wales
-
Penrith, New South Wales, Australia, 2750
- Nepean Hospital
-
Westmead, New South Wales, Australia, 2049
- Westmead Hospital
-
-
Queensland
-
Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia, 4102
- Princess Alexandra Hospital
-
-
Victoria
-
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3000
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ECOG performance status 0-1
- Life expectancy >6 months
- Number of lesions: ≤ 3
- Lesion size : < 10 cm for a single lesion (and up to 10 cm cumulative diameter for multiple lesions)
- Child-Pugh A or B7 within 6 weeks prior to study entry
- Unsuitable for RFA or resection or transplant
- Distance from GTV to luminal structures (i.e., oesophagus, stomach, duodenum, small or large bowel) ≥ 10mm
- All blood work obtained within 6 weeks prior to study entry with adequate organ function
- May have had previous surgery, RFA or ethanol injection
- Patient must have been discussed at multidisciplinary tumour board with consensus opinion for SBRT
Exclusion Criteria:
- HCC/cholangiocarcinoma with evidence of metastatic disease including nodal or distant metastases
- Metastatic disease with complete liver disease response to first-line chemotherapy (i.e. no target for SBRT)
- Previous radiation to the liver (including SIRTEX)
- Untreated HIV or active hepatitis B/C
- On systemic antineoplastic drug therapy within 7 days before inclusion
- Pregnant or lactating women
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: SABR with or without KIM
All patients will receive liver SABR.
Kilovoltage Intrafraction Monitoring (KIM) tracking will be trialed during mock treatment.
If KIM is successful, it will be used throughout treatment.
If unsuccessful, cone beam CT will be used instead.
|
KIM is a novel intrafraction real-time tumour localization method.
It involves a single gantry-mounted kV x-ray imager acquiring 2D projections of implanted fiducial markers.
3D positions are then reconstructed by maximum likelihood estimation of a 3D probability density function.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in accumulated patient dose distribution with and without KIM
Time Frame: 15-60 minutes (time of individual fraction delivery)
|
Isodose distributions and dose volume histograms for each session will be calculated with KIM corrections as treated, and estimated without KIM corrections.
The planning CT scan will be used for this assessment
|
15-60 minutes (time of individual fraction delivery)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in treatment time with and without KIM
Time Frame: 15-60 minutes (time of individual fraction delivery)
|
The time taken for the KIM treatments compared with the time taken for similar treatments from previous patients, accounting for the difference in the time and number of patient images acquired and the time taken to adjust the patient's position during treatment
|
15-60 minutes (time of individual fraction delivery)
|
|
Difference in imaging dose with and without KIM
Time Frame: 15-60 minutes (time of individual fraction delivery)
|
The KIM procedure adds radiation dose with the kilovoltage images.
However, there may be fewer volumetric cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans acquired.
This difference in dose will be estimated and analysed
|
15-60 minutes (time of individual fraction delivery)
|
|
Difference in PTV margins with and without KIM
Time Frame: 15-60 minutes (time of individual fraction delivery)
|
The clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin with and without KIM will be recorded and analysed.
|
15-60 minutes (time of individual fraction delivery)
|
|
Difference in accumulated patient dose distribution with and without KIM based on the intra-treatment CBCT scans
Time Frame: 15-60 minutes (time of individual fraction delivery)
|
Isodose distributions and dose volume histograms for each session will be calculated with KIM corrections as treated, and estimated without KIM corrections.
The intratreatment CBCT scans will be used for this assessment.
|
15-60 minutes (time of individual fraction delivery)
|
|
Change in dose when using KIM with and without using MLC tracking
Time Frame: 15-60 minutes (time of individual fraction delivery
|
Difference between dose delivered using KIM with or without MLC tracking
|
15-60 minutes (time of individual fraction delivery
|
|
Proportion of local failures at two years for patients treated
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Proportion of local failures at two years for patients treated as assessed using modified RECIST criteria
|
2 years
|
|
The proportion of grade 3 or higher toxicities
Time Frame: 2 years
|
The proportion of grade 3 or higher toxicities, assessed using CTCAE v4.03
|
2 years
|
|
Patient-reported quality of life as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life-Questionnaire-Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: 2 years
|
To compare change in Quality of Life, as defined by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30 (Version 3)) from baseline at completion of radiation therapy and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-radiation therapy.
The EORTC QLQ-C30 (Version 3) uses for the questions 1 to 28 a 4-point scale.
The scale scores from 1 to 4: 1 ("Not at all"), 2 ("A little"), 3 ("Quite a bit") and 4 ("Very much").
Half points are not allowed.
The range is 3.
For the raw score, less points are considered to have a better outcome.
The EORTC QLQ-C30 (Version 3) uses for the questions 29 and 30 a 7-points scale.
The scale scores from 1 to 7: 1 ("very poor") to 7 ("excellent").
The questionnaire will be self-administered and will be given in patient's mother tongue.
|
2 years
|
|
Patient-reported quality of life as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life-Questionnaire-Hepatocellular Carcinoma 18 Module (EORTC QLQ-HCC18)
Time Frame: 18 months
|
To compare change in Quality of Life related to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as defined by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Hepatocellular Carcinoma 18 Module (EORTC QLQ-HCC) from baseline at completion of radiation therapy and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-radiation therapy.
The questionnaire will be self-administered and will be given to patients proficient in English.
EORTC-QLQ-HCC18: includes HCC-specific symptoms or problems.
Questions used 4-point Likert scale from 1 to 4: 1 ("Not at all"), 2 ("A little"), 3 ("Quite a bit") and 4 ("Very much").
Scores averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale.
High score for functional scale=high/healthy level of functioning.
High score for single item=high level of symptomatology/problems.
|
18 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Tim Wang, Dr, Westmead Hospital
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- TROG1703 LARK
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.