Comparison of Topography Guided LASIK With WaveLight® EX500 to SMILE With Zeiss VisuMax

July 9, 2018 updated by: Alcon, a Novartis Company
The purpose of this study is to compare Topography Guided Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) corneal surgery to Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) corneal surgery for the treatment of myopia with astigmatism.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
21

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Paris, France, 75008
        • Alcon Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects in Singapore must be 21 years of age or older and subjects in Korea must be upon completion of 19 years of age or older due to local regulations;
  • Able to comprehend and sign an informed consent form;
  • Willing and able to complete all postoperative visits;
  • Myopia requiring (a) refractive error correction of -0.5 to -8.0 D optical infinity adjusted manifest refraction sphere with (b) astigmatism correction of -0.75 to -5.0 D manifest refraction cylinder and (c) at least 0.75 D of corneal astigmatism.
  • Intended treatment targeted for emmetropia;
  • Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0 logMAR or better;
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating, current or planned, during the course of the study;
  • Dry eye;
  • Corneal disease;
  • Diagnosis of advanced glaucoma;
  • Uncontrolled diabetes;
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: LASIK with EX500
Topography Guided LASIK with WaveLight EX500 excimer laser system in bilateral surgery
Procedure: Topography Guided LASIK
Corneal surgery for refractive error correction
Device: WaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System
As used for corneal stroma ablation (refractive error correction). The treatment is intended to last the subject's lifetime.
Active Comparator: SMILE with VisuMax
Small incision lenticular extraction (SMILE) with VisuMax laser in bilateral surgery
Procedure: Small Incision Lenticular Extraction
Refractive surgical procedure for the correction of myopia with or without astigmatism
Other Names:
  • SMILE
Device: VisuMax Surgical Laser
As used for lenticule creation/removal (refractive error correction). The treatment is intended to last the subject's lifetime.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Eyes With Manifest Refraction Cylinder Less Than or Equal to 0.5 Diopter (D) at 3 Months
Time Frame: Month 3
Manifest refraction cylinder was measured monocularly (each eye separately) at 3 or 4 meters (m) under photopic lighting conditions using a phoropter and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. The manifest refraction at 4 m or 3 m was adjusted for optical infinity by adding -0.25 D to the sphere value. Both eyes contributed to the analysis. Since the study was terminated early, inferential statistics could not be completed.
Month 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Manifest Refraction Cylinder at 3 Months
Time Frame: Month 3
Manifest refraction cylinder was measured monocularly at 3 or 4 meters under photopic lighting conditions using a phoropter and ETDRS chart. The manifest refraction at 4 m or 3 m was adjusted for optical infinity by adding -0.25 D to the sphere value. Both eyes contributed to the analysis. Since the study was terminated early, inferential statistics could not be completed.
Month 3
Mean Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) at 3 Months
Time Frame: Month 3
Uncorrected (without spectacles or other visual corrective devices) Visual Acuity (UCVA) testing was conducted monocularly in photopic conditions without glare at 3 or 4 meters. Visual Acuity (VA) is measured in "logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution" (logMAR). A lower logMAR value indicates better visual acuity. The Precision Vision illuminator cabinets and ETDRS charts were used. For subjects who could not read English letters, a numerical, Tumbling E logMAR chart was used. Since the study was terminated early, inferential statistics could not be completed.
Month 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Alcon, a Novartis Company

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Alcon, A Novartis Division, Alcon, A Novartis Division

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 3, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 26, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 26, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 9, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 14, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 9, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RFL605-P001

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings