Development of a Mobile Application to Promote Self-care in Patients With Fibromyalgia
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Sao Paulo, Brazil, 05360-160
- Department of Physical Therapy, Speech Therapy and Occupational Therapy of the School of Medicine of the University of Sao Paulo
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- diagnosis of fibromyalgia, according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria
- smartphone user
- complete primary education
Exclusion Criteria:
- being in physical therapy treatment for fibromyalgia or having been treated in the last 3 months
- diagnosis of other chronic pain conditions (neuropathies, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, spinal stenosis or cancer)
- severe mental disorders (schizophrenia, psychosis, bipolar affective disorder, severe depression)
- moderate or severe intellectual disability
- hearing or visual impairment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Mobile application
|
ProFibro, a mobile Android application in Brazilian Portuguese to promote self-care in patients with fibromyalgia
|
|
Active Comparator: Paper booklet
|
A 64-page booklet with content similar to the mobile application
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Health-related Quality of Life Assessed With the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100.
Higher scores mean worse outcome.
|
6 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Painful Areas Assessed With the Widespread Pain Index
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 19.
|
6 weeks
|
|
Pain Assessed With the Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 10.
Higher scores mean worse outcome.
|
6 weeks
|
|
Severity of Symptoms Assessed With the Symptom Severity Scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 12. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
|
6 weeks
|
|
Self-care Agency Assessed With the Appraisal of Self-Care Agency Scale - Revised
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Minimum value: 15.
Maximum value: 75.
Higher scores mean better outcome.
|
6 weeks
|
|
Adherence to Mobile Application Assessed by Number of Clicks on the App Functions
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Number of clicks on the app functions
|
6 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Susan LK Yuan, MSc, Rehabilitation Sciences PhD program of the School of Medicine of the University of Sao Paulo
- Study Chair: Amelia P Marques, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy, Speech Therapy and Occupational Therapy of the School of Medicine of the University of Sao Paulo
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Bennett RM, Friend R, Jones KD, Ward R, Han BK, Ross RL. The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR): validation and psychometric properties. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(4):R120. doi: 10.1186/ar2783. Epub 2009 Aug 10. Erratum In: Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(5):415.
- Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Katz RS, Mease P, Russell AS, Russell IJ, Winfield JB, Yunus MB. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 May;62(5):600-10. doi: 10.1002/acr.20140.
- Nam S, Tin D, Bain L, Thorne JC, Ginsburg L. Clinical utility of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for an outpatient fibromyalgia education program. Clin Rheumatol. 2014 May;33(5):685-92. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2377-1. Epub 2013 Sep 1.
- Bennett RM, Bushmakin AG, Cappelleri JC, Zlateva G, Sadosky AB. Minimal clinically important difference in the fibromyalgia impact questionnaire. J Rheumatol. 2009 Jun;36(6):1304-11. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.081090. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
- Altman DG, Bland JM. How to randomise. BMJ. 1999 Sep 11;319(7211):703-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7211.703. No abstract available.
- Paiva ES, Heymann RE, Rezende MC, Helfenstein M Jr, Martinez JE, Provenza JR, Ranzolin A, de Assis MR, Pasqualin VD, Bennett RM. A Brazilian Portuguese version of the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR): a validation study. Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Aug;32(8):1199-206. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2259-6. Epub 2013 Apr 21.
- Henriksson C, Carlberg U, Kjallman M, Lundberg G, Henriksson KG. Evaluation of four outpatient educational programmes for patients with longstanding fibromyalgia. J Rehabil Med. 2004 Sep;36(5):211-9. doi: 10.1080/16501970410027494.
- Bennett R. The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ): a review of its development, current version, operating characteristics and uses. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005 Sep-Oct;23(5 Suppl 39):S154-62.
- Marques AP, Assumpcao A, Matsutani LA, Pereira CA, Lage L. Pain in fibromyalgia and discrimination power of the instruments: Visual Analog Scale, Dolorimetry and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Acta Reumatol Port. 2008 Jul-Sep;33(3):345-51.
- Sousa VD, Zauszniewski JA, Bergquist-Beringer S, Musil CM, Neese JB, Jaber AF. Reliability, validity and factor structure of the Appraisal of Self-Care Agency Scale-Revised (ASAS-R). J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;16(6):1031-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01242.x.
- Damasio BF, Koller SH. The Appraisal of Self-Care Agency Scale - Revised (ASAS-R): adaptation and construct validity in the Brazilian context. Cad Saude Publica. 2013 Oct;29(10):2071-82. doi: 10.1590/0102-311x00165312.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 274/14
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.