Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Darunavir/Cobicistat (DRV/c) Containing Regimens in Routine Clinical Practice (CoDAR)

February 3, 2020 updated by: Fundacion SEIMC-GESIDA

Multicenter Retrospective Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Darunavir/Cobicistat (DRV/c) Containing Regimens in Routine Clinical Practice

This is a retrospective observational study of patients who have taken a regimen containing DRV / c at least 24 weeks prior to study initiation

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

The study will include 750 patients and will record data at 24 weeks. The study will also record data at 48 weeks for those patients whom these data are available

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
762

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital Del Mar
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital de La Santa Creu i Sant Pau
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital Clinic I Provincial
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital Germans Trías i Pujol
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital del Vall d'Hebron
      • Guadalajara, Spain
        • Hospital de Guadalajara
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital Ramon y Cajal
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital La Paz
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital La Princesa
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital Infanta Leonor
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital Puerta de Hierro
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital Principe de Asturias
      • Malaga, Spain
        • Hospital Virgen de la Victoria
      • Palma de Mallorca, Spain
        • Hospital de Son Llàtzer
      • Sevilla, Spain
        • Hospital De Valme
      • Toledo, Spain
        • Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo
      • Valencia, Spain
        • Hospital Clínico de Valencia
      • Valencia, Spain
        • Hospital La Fe
      • Vigo, Spain
        • Complejo Hospitalaria Alvaron Cunqueiro
    • Marbella
      • Malaga, Marbella, Spain
        • Hospital Costa del Sol

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

HIV patients that initiated treatment with a régimen containing DRV/c at least 24 weeks prior initiation of study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with HIV infection
  • Inform consent document.
  • To have initiated therapy containing DRV / c and have a follow-up of at least 24 Weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not having evaluable clinical data of the patient
  • Patients not routinely followed in the center
  • Patient less than 18 years of age.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
DArunavir/cobicistat
Patients starting treatment with a regimen containing Darunavir / cobicistat for at least 24 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Virological effectiveness data: Percentage of patients with undetectable viral load
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Virological effectiveness data at 24 weeks: Percentage of patients with undetectable viral load, defined as HIV RNA <50 copies / m.
24 weeks
Virological effectiveness data: change in the number of CD4 + T cells at 24 weeks
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Change in the number of CD4 + T cells at 24 weeks
24 weeks
Virological effectiveness data: time to loss of virological efficacy.
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Defined virological failure as two consecutive levels of HIV RNA > 50 copies / mL or single HIV RNA ≥ 500 copies / mL
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Virological effectiveness data: Percentage of patients with undetectable viral load, defined as HIV RNA levels ≤ 50 copies / mL or limit of detection of the center, at 48 weeks
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Virological effectiveness data at 48 weeks
48 weeks
Virological effectiveness data: change in the number of CD4 + T cells, at 48 weeks
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Virological effectiveness data at 48 weeks: change in the number of CD4 + T cells
48 weeks
Changes in the renal profile: Comparison of mean values of Creatinine and eFG (CKD-EPI).
Time Frame: Basal and 24 weeks/48 weeks
Creatinine (mg/dl), eFG (CKD-EPI) (ml/min/1,73 m2),
Basal and 24 weeks/48 weeks
Changes in the lipid profile: Comparison of mean values of total cholesterol values, Col LDL, Col HDL and TG.
Time Frame: basal and 24 weeks/48 weeks
Units: mg/dl or mmol/l
basal and 24 weeks/48 weeks
Changes in the hepatic profile: comparison of mean values of GOT, GPT, FA, GGT and BrT
Time Frame: basal and 24 weeks/48 weeks
GOT, GPT, FA, GGT in units: UI/l or μKat/l or mU/ml. BrT in units: mg/dl or micromol/l
basal and 24 weeks/48 weeks
Tolerability data:Rate of patients discontinuing treatment for toxicity.
Time Frame: 24 weeks/48 weeks
Toxicity to the treatment or virological failure
24 weeks/48 weeks
Tolerability data: Rate of patients discontinuing treatment for virological failure at 24 weeks / 48 weeks
Time Frame: 24 weeks/48 weeks
Virological failure defined as two consecutive levels of HIV RNA > 50 copies / mL or single HIV RNA ≥ 500 copies / mL
24 weeks/48 weeks
Rate of patients who develop any adverse effects:frequency of adverse events,frequency of serious adverse events, frequency of adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment, number of deaths and frequency of laboratory abnormalities.
Time Frame: 24 weeks/48 weeks
24 weeks/48 weeks
Representative subgroups of patients according to the treatment that patient is taking: Percentage of patients with different Darunavir/cobicistat based regimens (Monotherapy, Bitherapy, triple Therapy, others)
Time Frame: 24 weeks / 48 weeks
24 weeks / 48 weeks
Provenance treatments: Percentage of patients with different prior therapies (Darunavir Therapy, Other PI therapies, NNRTI based regimen, INI bases regimen
Time Frame: 24 weeks / 48 weeks
24 weeks / 48 weeks
Reason for the change prior the initiation:Percentage of patients with each main reason to change to a DRV/c based regimen (first regimen, simplification, intolerance or toxicity, prior adherence problems, prior interactions, prior failure, others)
Time Frame: 24 weeks / 48 weeks
24 weeks / 48 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fundacion SEIMC-GESIDA

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Janssen-Cilag, S.A.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 23, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 9, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 9, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 19, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 1, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 3, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 3, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GESIDA 9316

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings