Intraoperative Non-invasive Eye Movement Monitoring
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
- Mayo Clinic in Rochester
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject will be undergoing surgery involved of the nerves controlling the eye
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EEG Electrode Patch
The additional electrodes are modified EEG electrodes (used in clinical practice on the head already) placed in a silicone molding.
These are placed lateral to the eye with the patient asleep.
These are then wired to the same recording apparatus that is commonly used for recording.
|
The additional electrodes are modified EEG electrodes (used in clinical practice on the head already) placed in a silicone molding.
These are placed lateral to the eye with the patient asleep.
These are then wired to the same recording apparatus that we would commonly use for recording.
|
|
Standard Needles
The current solution to monitor eye movement during surgery is to place standard needles in the muscles surrounding the eye.
|
Needles are placed in the muscles surrounding the eye to measure eye movements.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of subjects with greater than 95% concordance in signal between the standard needles and EEG electrode patch
Time Frame: approximately 30 minutes
|
The current method of measuring eye movement is to place needles in the muscles surrounding the eye.
For the non-invasive method, the electrode is placed on the skin on the corner of the eye and using the natural dipole of the eye, detects horizontal and vertical movements of the eye.
The signal comparison for the two methods would be a biphasic dipole representing eye movements compared to the compound muscle action potential of the invasive method.
|
approximately 30 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jamie J Van Gompel, MD, Mayo Clinic
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 16-010266
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.