Short-term Perfusion Angiography Pilot Study (SPA) (SPA)

June 10, 2020 updated by: Volcano Corporation

Short-term 2D Perfusion Angiography Pilot Study

The Short term Perfusion Angiography (SPA) study is designed to collect 2D Perfusion data from Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) endovascular (interventional) procedures for information on device performance in a real-world setting.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

This clinical study is designed to collect pre and post procedural imaging data using 2D Perfusion (2DP) software in patients receiving an endovascular intervention.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
38

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33176
        • Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute
    • Michigan
      • Wyoming, Michigan, United States, 49519
        • Metro Health Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27607
        • North Carolina Heart and Vascular
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • University Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Approximately 132 patients with critical limb ischemia (Rutherford classification 4, 5 or 6) considered candidates for a diagnostic angiogram and likely endovascular intervention expected to be enrolled into the SPA Study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is ≥ 18 years of age.
  2. Subject or their legally authorized representative understands the research nature of the study and is willing and capable of providing informed consent
  3. Subject has appropriate femoral arterial access
  4. Subject presents with a Rutherford classification of 4 to 6.

  5. Planned DSA with endovascular intervention below the knee on one or both limbs. This may include patients who undergo:

    1. Above the knee (ATK) and below the knee (BTK) intervention during the same procedure.
    2. Only BTK intervention.
    3. ATK intervention with staged future BTK intervention within 6 weeks of the initial procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects whose ATK intervention is limited to only the common femoral or iliac arteries
  2. Subject is unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol including all follow-up visits
  3. Subject with active atrial fibrillation at time of procedure
  4. Critical limb ischemia due to acute arterial occlusion.
  5. Subject with documented ejection fraction < 40% and/or prolonged bradycardia (< 60 beats per minute)
  6. Inability to collect toe pressure on index limb from subject
  7. Subjects with history of or known reaction or sensitivity to contrast agent that cannot be pre-medicated or any other condition that precludes an endovascular intervention and DSA
  8. Female subject of childbearing potential who is pregnant (she must have negative pregnancy test within the 48 hours prior to enrollment), or plans a pregnancy during study period,
  9. Subject life expectancy < 3 months,
  10. Subject is participating in a potentially confounding device or drug clinical trial that interferes with this study
  11. Investigator considers subject to be a poor candidate for the study or believes that the patient may compromise the study, e.g., concomitant conditions (reasons will be documented) )

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety (Freedom from Major Adverse Device Effects)
Time Frame: 30 days
Freedom from Major Adverse Device Effects through 30 day visit.
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Volcano Corporation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Larry J Diaz-Sandoval, MD, Metro Health Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 14, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 14, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 14, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 10, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 160201

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings