Observational Study: Safety and Effectiveness of Obinutuzumab in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Argentina

April 16, 2020 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

An Observational Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Obinutuzumab in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated in Argentina

This observational study aims to study the effectiveness and safety of Obinutuzumab in common clinical practice settings in Argentina. The study population comprises all patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) that have received the indication for treatment with Obinutuzumab as per routine clinical practice.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Argentina
      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • Clínica Peuyrredón
      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • Hospital Municipal Teodoro Alvarez

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who have received the indication for treatment with Obinutuzumab as per routine clinical practice in Argentina.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have received at least one dose of Obinutuzumab as per local label and clinical practice.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Included in clinical trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Obinutuzumab
All participants with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who have received the indication for treatment with Obinutuzumab, as per routine clinical practice in Argentina.
Biological: Obinutuzumab
Obinutuzumab will be administered as intravenous infusion for 6 cycles (28 days per cycle): 100 milligrams (mg) on day 1 Cycle 1, 900 mg on day 2 Cycle 1, 1000 mg on days 8 and 15 of Cycle 1, and 1000 mg on day 1 of Cycles 2-6.
Other Names:
  • Gazyva®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Response Rate
Time Frame: Up to 2 months after completion of 6 treatment cycles (up to approximately 8 months)
Overall response rate was defined as percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR was defined as peripheral blood lymphocytes below 4 x 10^9/liter (L), absence of significant lymphadenopathy, no hepatomegaly, no splenomegaly, absence of disease or B symptoms, neutrophils >1.5 x 10^9/L, platelets >100 x 10^9/L, hemoglobin >11 grams/deciliter (g/dl) and bone marrow at least normocellular for age. PR was defined as >=50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count, >/=50% reduction in lymphadenopathy, >/=50% reduction of liver enlargement and/or >/=50% reduction of spleen enlargement, plus at least one of the following: neutrophils >1.5 x 10^9/L or >/=50% increase, or platelets >100 x 10^9/L or ≥50% increase, or hemoglobin 11 g/dl or >/=50% increase. Overall response rate = CR + PR
Up to 2 months after completion of 6 treatment cycles (up to approximately 8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Up to 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete Response Rate
Time Frame: Up to 2 months after completion of 6 treatment cycles (up to approximately 8 months)
CR was defined as peripheral blood lymphocytes below 4 x 10^9/liter (L), absence of significant lymphadenopathy, no hepatomegaly, no splenomegaly, absence of disease or B symptoms, neutrophils >1.5 x 10^9/L, platelets >100 x 10^9/L, hemoglobin 11 g/dl and bone marrow at least normocellular for age.
Up to 2 months after completion of 6 treatment cycles (up to approximately 8 months)
Partial Response Rate
Time Frame: Up to 2 months after completion of 6 treatment cycles (up to approximately 8 months)
PR was defined as >=50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count from the pre-treatment value, >/=50% reduction in lymphadenopathy, >/=50% reduction of liver enlargement and/or >/=50% reduction of spleen enlargement, plus at least one of the following: neutrophils >1.5 x 10^9/L or >/=50% increase, or platelets >100 x 10^9/L or ≥50% increase, or hemoglobin 11 g/dl or >/=50% increase.
Up to 2 months after completion of 6 treatment cycles (up to approximately 8 months)
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: After the completion of treatment, at 12 and 24 months after start of treatment
PFS is defined as the time from the first dose of treatment to the first occurrence of progression, or death from any cause as assessed by the physician. Progressive disease is defined by any of the following: >/=50% increase in the absolute number of lymphocytes, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes (>15 mm in longest diameter) or any new extra nodal lesion, >/=50% increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, >/=50% increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen, transformation to a more aggressive histology, after treatment, the progression of any cytopenia (a decrease of hemoglobin levels >2 g/dL or <10 g/dL or a decrease of platelet counts >50% or <100 x 10x9/L or by a decrease of neutrophil counts >50% or <1.0 x 10^9/L), excluding immune causes.
After the completion of treatment, at 12 and 24 months after start of treatment
Median Duration of Response
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Duration of response is defined as the time from the date the response (either CR or PR) was first recorded until the date of disease progression or death due to any cause. Disease progression is defined by any of the following: >/=50% increase in the absolute number of lymphocytes, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes (>15 mm in longest diameter) or any new extra nodal lesion, >/=50% increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, >/=50% increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen, transformation to a more aggressive histology, after treatment, the progression of any cytopenia (a decrease of hemoglobin levels >2 g/dL or <10 g/dL or a decrease of platelet counts >50% or <100 x 10x9/L or by a decrease of neutrophil counts >50% or <1.0 x 10^9/L), excluding immune causes.
Up to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hoffmann-La Roche

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 31, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 30, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 17, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 16, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ML30187

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings