Standard Endoscopic Hemostasis Versus OVESCO Severe Non-variceal UGI Hemorrhage

August 24, 2024 updated by: CURE Digestive Diseases Research Center

Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) of Standard Endoscopic Hemostasis Compared to OVESCO for Severe Non-variceal UGI Hemorrhage

The primary specific aim is to perform a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare 30 day rebleed rates and other clinical outcomes of patients with severe, non-variceal upper GI hemorrhage (NVUGIH) - ulcers and Dieulafoy's lesions who are randomized as initial treatment with the new large over-the-scope-clip device for endoscopic hemostasis versus standard endoscopic hemostasis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Upper GI Hemorrhage (UGIH) causes significant morbidity and mortality, although endoscopic hemostasis has revolutionized management of these patients. Despite standard endoscopic treatment and high dose proton pump infusions, 25% - 30% of high risk patients with UGIB from ulcers or other non-variceal UGI lesions (NVUGI) had recurrent bleeding in a recent RCT and cohort studies by our group. Potential risk factors for NVUGI rebleeding were large ulcers (≥ 15 mm), fibrotic bases, Dieulafoy's lesions, anastomotic ulcers, coagulopathies, cirrhosis, other severe co-morbidities and residual arterial blood flow under stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) after endoscopic treatment. Such patients with rebleeding after standard endoscopic hemostasis usually required angiography (by interventional radiologists-IR) or surgery for definitive hemostasis. A new, large, FDA approved, over-the-scope hemoclipping device (OTSC® System OVESCO Endoscopy, Tübingen, Germany) can capture larger amounts of tissue and underlying arteries than standard hemoclips and potentially can improve endoscopic hemostasis of such bleeding lesions.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
65

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • Recruiting
        • University of California, Los Angeles
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dennis M Jensen, MD
        • Contact:
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90073
        • Recruiting
        • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dennis M Jensen, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent from the patient or a surrogate.
  • Clinical evidence of severe UGIB.
  • Presence of a benign appearing peptic ulcer, anastomotic ulcer, or Dieulafoy's lesion, with some SRH on endoscopy.
  • Severe upper GI bleeding.
  • Life expectancy of at least 30 days based on lack of severe or terminal comorbidity as judged by the generalist or subspecialist caring for the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are do-not-resuscitate (DNR) that is not reversible, uncooperative, refuse to participate, or are unable to give consent personally or through a legal surrogate.
  • Active GI malignancy, under treatment but not in remission.
  • Acute hypovolemic shock that is unresponsive to transfusion of 5 or more units of red blood cells (RBC's) or requires continuous intravenous vasopressor infusion for blood pressure support.
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) class V or higher, moribund, or with a very poor prognosis and expected survival <30 days.
  • Severe coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia despite attempted reversal with transfusion of blood products (e.g persistent International Normalized Ratio [INR] >2.0, platelet count <20,000, a Partial Thromboplastin Time [PTT] greater than 2x upper limit of normal).
  • Absolute contraindication to urgent endoscopy (such as suspected perforated viscus, or peritonitis).
  • Stricture of the esophagus or pylorus that can not be dilated or precludes passage of a diagnostic sized endoscope and/or the GI endoscope with an 11, 3a OTSC device attached.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Standard endoscopic treatment
For those assigned to the standard endoscopy group, endoscopic hemostasis is performed using usual CURE hemostasis therapy for the focal GI lesions: injection of dilute (e.g. 1: 20,000) epinephrine (in 1-2 cc aliquots in 4 quadrants next to the SRH) of active bleeding or adherent clots (prior to snaring them off); coaptive coagulation with multipolar electrocautery (MPEC) probe and/or standard through the endoscope hemoclips along the course of the underlying artery as detected by DEP. Hemostasis is performed until active bleeding stops and/or the SRH is obliterated. Residual blood flow after visually guided hemostasis is recorded, but not used as a guide for additional hemostasis in this study.
Other: Standard endoscopic treatment
Standard therapy includes injection of dilute epinephrine, thermal coagulation with multipolar electrocautery (MPEC) probe, and/or hemoclips.
Experimental: Over-the-scope hemoclipping device
For those assigned OTSC, prior to use of the OTSC in UGI lesions with active bleeding or adherent clots, dilute epinephrine (1: 20,000) is injected around the SRH in 1-2 cc aliquots and the clots are cold guillotined off, as previously described (2, 4, 17). As a brief additional description, after initial diagnosis and preparation of the lesion and SRH (as described for standard hemostasis), the therapeutic sized endoscope is removed and this or a diagnostic panendoscope will be affixed with the OTSC of appropriate size for the endoscope and the target lesion. The endoscope is re-introduced and passed to the bleeding site. The SRH is centered in the field of view and within the cap of the OTSC device. Using high suctioning and firm pressure to center the SRH, the lesion and SRH is captured into the cap and the OTSC is deployed by rotating the handle and thereby compressing the bleeding lesion and surrounding tissue with mechanical hemostasis.
Device: Over-the-scope hemoclipping device
A endoscopic entrapment of tissue for control of bleeding or other applications.
Other Names:
  • OTSC clip

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The rebleeding rate of non-variceal focal UGI lesions
Time Frame: Outcome measure will be assessed at 30 days after participants are enrolled
The investigators will compare the rebleeding rate at 30 days follow up in the two treatment groups for all patients, ulcer patients only, and also patients with major stigmata of hemorrhage vs. lesser stigmata (oozing or flat spots).
Outcome measure will be assessed at 30 days after participants are enrolled

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Obliteration rates of underlying arterial blood flow (detected by Doppler endoscopic probe)
Time Frame: Outcome measure will be assessed at 30 days after the endoscopy treatment is completed
The investigators will use the Doppler endoscopic probe to measure the blood flow before and after the application of over-the-hemoclipping device and standard endoscopic hemostasis.
Outcome measure will be assessed at 30 days after the endoscopy treatment is completed
Rates of surgery or IR, complications, and death
Time Frame: Outcome measure will be assessed at 30 days after participants are enrolled
The investigators will compare the rates of surgery or IR, complications, transfusion, hospital stays, and death at 30 days for the two treatment groups.
Outcome measure will be assessed at 30 days after participants are enrolled

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
CURE Digestive Diseases Research Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of California, Los Angeles
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Dennis M Jensen, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 15, 2015

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 24, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 28, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 29, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 22, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 24, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • OVESCO

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings