Handheld Vibrator Versus Topical Eye Drops as Anesthesia for Intravitreal Injections (Eyebrator)
Comparison of Handheld Vibrator to Topical Eye Drops as Anesthesia for Intravitreal Injections
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A total of 80 patients will be recruited for part 1 of the study. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to a standard anesthetic group or standard anesthetic with vibration groups. All intravitreal drugs will be delivered via 30 gauge needles through the pars plana in the inferotemporal quadrant 3.5 to 4 mm posterior to the limbus. Once recruited, a single eye requiring injection for each enrolled patient will be randomized into 1 of 2 groups: aesthesiometer measurement alone with sham vibration (vibrator will not be triggered) (Group 1) or handheld vibrator application and triggering followed by aesthesiometer measurement (Group 2). The vibrator will be applied to the lower eyelid while retracting it during standard intravitreal injection prepped with topical anesthetic (Proparacaine 1%) and Betadine. The main outcome measure of will be patient comfort, as measured by the patient using a standardized Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.
An additional 30 eyes of 30 healthy patients not requiring intravitreal injection will be recruited to determine the effect of vibrator application and triggering to the lower lid on corneal and conjunctival (inferotemporal quadrant) sensation as measured using an aesthesiometer. No topical anesthetic will be applied prior to esthesiometry measurements are taken with and without vibration triggering.
All patient identifying information will be removed and patients will be identified with a random number. Data will be checked regularly by a data monitoring committee. Patient records will be reviewed and the following data will be collected: demographic data (age, gender, injected eye, reason for injection), best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and complications/adverse events associated with intravitreal injections. Statistical analyses will include univariate comparisons between treatment groups using the Student t-test for continuous variables and χ2 test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
- MidAtlantic Retina-Wills Eye Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of neovascular age related macular degeneration requiring anti-VEGF intravitreal injection in the routine course of their care
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of endophthalmitis, prior ocular surgery except cataract surgery, globe rupture, retinal detachment, neurotrophic keratopathy, a history of corneal epithelial basement membrane dystrophy, recent corneal abrasion or trauma, history of infectious keratitis, lower eyelid pathology, those with a previously documented hypersensitivity to ophthalmic 5% povidone-iodine solution (Betadine; Alcon Labs, Fort Worth, TX) or inability to grade pain using the pain scale, pregnant patients, institutionalized patients (nursing home residents, prisoners), those with a history of diabetes
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Vibratory Anesthesia
Following administration of topical anesthetic and betadine, wearable vibrator will be triggered prior to and during the intravitreal injection
|
A vibratory device cleaned with alcohol swabs between each use will be attached to the injectors' finger, placed on the lower eyelid of the treatment eye, and triggered during intravitreal injection
|
|
Sham Comparator: Standard Injection.
Following administration of topical anesthetic and betadine, wearable vibrator will be placed against the lower lid but NOT triggered prior to and during the intravitreal injection
|
Control group undergoing standard intravitreal injection without triggering of the vibrator.
|
|
Experimental: Vibratory Anesthesia with Corneal/Conjunctival Sensation Test
Healthy patients not requiring intravitreal injection will be subjected to corneal and conjunctival aesthesiometry with and without the vibrator triggered while in contact with the lower eyelid of a single eye.
|
Healthy patients will undergo corneal and conjunctival esthesiometry with and without triggering of the wearable vibrator placed upon the lower lid of a single eye.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain assessment
Time Frame: Immediately after intravitreal injection
|
Pain is assessed by Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (score ranging from 0 to 10) immediately after the intravitreal injection
|
Immediately after intravitreal injection
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Corneal and conjunctival sensitivity
Time Frame: immediately after application of a handheld vibrator
|
Corneal and conjunctival sensitivity, as measured using an aesthesiometer
|
immediately after application of a handheld vibrator
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mitchell Fineman, MD, Mid Atlantic Retina
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Nanitsos E, Vartuli R, Forte A, Dennison PJ, Peck CC. The effect of vibration on pain during local anaesthesia injections. Aust Dent J. 2009 Jun;54(2):94-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01100.x.
- Smith KC, Comite SL, Balasubramanian S, Carver A, Liu JF. Vibration anesthesia: a noninvasive method of reducing discomfort prior to dermatologic procedures. Dermatol Online J. 2004 Oct 15;10(2):1.
- Aminabadi NA, Farahani RM, Balayi Gajan E. The efficacy of distraction and counterstimulation in the reduction of pain reaction to intraoral injection by pediatric patients. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Sep 1;9(6):33-40.
- Friedman SM, Margo CE. Topical gel vs subconjunctival lidocaine for intravitreous injection: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Nov;142(5):887-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.06.033.
- Kaderli B, Avci R. Comparison of topical and subconjunctival anesthesia in intravitreal injection administrations. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2006 Sep-Oct;16(5):718-21. doi: 10.1177/112067210601600509.
- Cintra LP, Lucena LR, Da Silva JA, Costa RA, Scott IU, Jorge R. Comparative study of analgesic effectiveness using three different anesthetic techniques for intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2009 Jan-Feb;40(1):13-8. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20090101-05.
- Karabas VL, Ozkan B, Kocer CA, Altintas O, Pirhan D, Yuksel N. Comparison of two anesthetic methods for intravitreal ozurdex injection. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:861535. doi: 10.1155/2015/861535. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
- Ornek N, Apan A, Ornek K, Gunay F. Anesthetic effectiveness of topical levobupivacaine 0.75% versus topical proparacaine 0.5% for intravitreal injections. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Apr;8(2):198-201. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.130713.
- Lundeberg TC. Vibratory stimulation for the alleviation of chronic pain. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1983;523:1-51.
- Bagherian A, Sheikhfathollahi M. Children's behavioral pain reactions during local anesthetic injection using cotton-roll vibration method compared with routine topical anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2016 May-Jun;13(3):272-7. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.182189.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 16-600E
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain Control During Intravitreal Injections
-
NCT06810011RecruitingIntravitreal Injections
-
NCT04343222CompletedIntravitreal Injections | IVI
-
NCT03964597WithdrawnLens Opacification | Intravitreal Injections (IVT)
-
NCT00702039CompletedPatient Satisfaction | Intravitreal Injections | Patient Anxiety
-
NCT02669953RecruitingDiabetic Macular Edema | Age Related Macular Degeneration | Intravitreal Injections
-
NCT07571889RecruitingPain From onabotulinumtoxinA Injections
-
NCT07609017RecruitingEvaluating Endoscopist Tip Control During STSC Application
-
NCT04144985CompletedPain | Intravitreal Injection
-
NCT05402631RecruitingBack Pain | Satisfaction, Patient | Back Pain Lower Back Chronic | Pain, Back | Expectations | Injections, Epidural | Injections, Periradicular
-
NCT07481500Not yet recruitingDiabetic Macular Edema | Retinal Vein Occlusion | Intravitreal Injections | Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD)