Standard PET/CT vs. Digital PET/CT
Comparison of Standard PET/CT vs. Digital PET/CT
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Stanford, California, United States, 94305
- Stanford University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient is ≥ 18 years old at the time of the scan
- Patient provides written informed consent
- Patient is referred for standard (F18 FDG; F18 NaF; Ga68 DOTATATE) or research (68Ga PSMA or 68Ga RM2) PET/CT
- Patient is capable of complying with study procedures
- Patient is able to remain still for duration of imaging procedure (approximately 60 minutes total for both PET/CT)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient is pregnant or nursing
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
- Allocation: NA
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
OTHER: Patients undergoing digital PET/CT
Single arm prospective study of paired imaging studies.
Patients who are referred to Nuclear Medicine and are scheduled to undergo imaging on the standard PET/CT will also have imaging performed on the digital PET/CT.
|
The Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging at Stanford has installed the first ever GE-made digital PET/CT scanner worldwide.
The investigators wish to determine if the digital PET/CT scanner offers equivalent image quality as the standard PET/CT scanner.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnostic Image Quality
Time Frame: an expected average of 3 hours
|
Diagnostic image quality will be determined using a 5-point Likert Scale that reads: 5 - Diagnostic: Excellent diagnostic image quality; 4 - Diagnostic: Good diagnostic image quality; 3 - Diagnostic: Acceptable diagnostic image quality; 2 - Sub-optimal diagnostic: image quality with limited additional clinical information; 1 - Non-diagnostic: non-diagnostic image quality |
an expected average of 3 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Duan H, Baratto L, Hatami N, Liang T, Mari Aparici C, Davidzon GA, Iagaru A. 68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: Influence of dual-time and PMT- vs SiPM-based detectors. Transl Oncol. 2022 Jan;15(1):101293. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101293. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
- Baratto L, Toriihara A, Hatami N, Aparici CM, Davidzon G, Levin CS, Iagaru A. Results of a Prospective Trial to Compare 68Ga-DOTA-TATE with SiPM-Based PET/CT vs. Conventional PET/CT in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 30;11(6):992. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11060992.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB Protocol: 39329
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.