Characterization of Myocardial Interstitial Fibrosis and Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy by Cardiac MRI in Heart Failure

June 3, 2019 updated by: Otavio Rizzi Coelho Filho, University of Campinas, Brazil

Characterization of Myocardial Interstitial Fibrosis and Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy by Cardiac MRI In Heart Failure: Implication on Early Remodeling and on the Transition to Heart Failure

The investigators hypothesised that novel MRI metrics derived from myocardium post-gadolinium T1 mapping analysis will improve the current knowledge about the role interstitial fibrosis and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in the development of left ventricular (LV) remodelling and clinical Heart Failure (HF). The investigators believe that these recently described variables will be associated with prognostically important indices in HF development.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Cardiac hypertrophy is one of the earliest manifestations of myocardial disease, representing a modifiable, prognostic response to hemodynamic stimuli across physiologic (e.g., exercise) and pathologic states (e.g., hypertension, aortic stenosis). The extent of myocardial hypertrophy is determined by a combination of cardiomyocyte size and extracellular volume (ECV) expansion/interstitial fibrosis: while physiologic (exercise-induced) hypertrophy reflects mostly reversible cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, pathologic hypertrophy (e.g., in heart failure) is a combination of both interstitial fibrosis (potentially irreversible) and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy (reversible). Current methods to delineate the potential for LV reverse remodeling (e.g., natriuretic peptides and echocardiographic or clinical markers) detect primarily advanced disease, missing a critical opportunity to intervene and follow patients at an early disease phase where myocardial pathology may be reversible. Therefore, establishing novel, quantitative metrics of myocardial tissue phenotype that define a transition from hypertrophy to fibrosis, and then to irreversible LV remodeling/dysfunction may facilitate targeting therapies at a modifiable stage of disease in HF. The investigator's group has recently extended cardiac T1 mapping MRI techniques to quantify the intracellular lifetime of water (τic) serially as an index of cardiomyocyte diameter, validating this technique histologically in mouse models of pressure overload.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
90

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age> 18 years
  • Functional limitation (New York Heart Association Class II or worse)
  • No contraindication to exercise (American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association criteria)
  • Eligibility to take MRI (absence of metallic devices, and glomerular filtration rate > 40ml / min / 1.73m2, etc.)
  • Prior diagnosis of Heart Failure (by the Framingham criterion)
  • Therapy with diuretic and euvolemia state (evaluated by cardiologist and cardiopulmonary exercise testing)
  • Transthoracic echocardiogram

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe ischemia in any stress test
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or any infiltrative heart disease
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease , pulmonary hypertension (Pulmonary artery pressure> 60mmHg)
  • Severe left or right valve disease.
  • Pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator
  • Myocardial infarction or revascularization in 3 months
  • Anemia (hemoglobin <10 grams / dl) until 1 month before cardiopulmonary exercise testing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Conventional Clinical Care - HFpEF
Heart Failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) randomized to this arm will keep receiving their conventional clinical care, being instructed to continue and maintain their usual daily activities.
Other: Supervised Exercise Training- HFpEF
Heart Failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) randomized to this arm will keep receiving their conventional clinical care and participate in a supervised, facility based training program consisting of stretching exercises and aerobic exercise in treadmill.
Other: Aerobic exercise in treadmill
30-40min of aerobic exercise in treadmill. The aerobic intensity will be established by heart rate levels that corresponded to anaerobic threshold up to 10% below the respiratory compensation point obtained in the cardiopulmonary exercise test. This intensity corresponded to 60-72% peak V̇o2. During the exercise sessions, when a training effect will be observed, as indicated by a decrease by 8 to 10% in heart rate, the treadmill velocity or inclination will be increased to return to the target heart rate levels.
Other: Local strengthening exercises
15 min of local strengthening exercises will be performed in major muscle groups (legs, arms and trunk muscles): three series of each exercise, 12-15 repetitions.
Other: Stretching exercises
5-min stretching exercises will be performed in major muscle groups (legs, arms and trunk muscles)
No Intervention: Conventional Clinical Care - HFrEF
Heart Failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) randomized to this arm will keep receiving their conventional clinical care, being instructed to continue and maintain their usual daily activities.
Other: Supervised Exercise Training - HFrEF
Heart Failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) randomized to this arm will keep receiving their conventional clinical care and participate in a supervised, facility based training program consisting of stretching exercises and aerobic exercise in treadmill.
Other: Aerobic exercise in treadmill
30-40min of aerobic exercise in treadmill. The aerobic intensity will be established by heart rate levels that corresponded to anaerobic threshold up to 10% below the respiratory compensation point obtained in the cardiopulmonary exercise test. This intensity corresponded to 60-72% peak V̇o2. During the exercise sessions, when a training effect will be observed, as indicated by a decrease by 8 to 10% in heart rate, the treadmill velocity or inclination will be increased to return to the target heart rate levels.
Other: Local strengthening exercises
15 min of local strengthening exercises will be performed in major muscle groups (legs, arms and trunk muscles): three series of each exercise, 12-15 repetitions.
Other: Stretching exercises
5-min stretching exercises will be performed in major muscle groups (legs, arms and trunk muscles)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Myocardial remodeling assessed by CMR in rehabilitation vs usual care.
Time Frame: 4 months
Investigate whether rehabilitation compared to usual care is associated with significant favorable myocardial remodeling assessed by CMR determination of ECV.
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction
Time Frame: 4 months
Left Ventricular ejection fraction (%) will be determined by cardiac magnetic resonance using a previously described cine steady-state free precession imaging. All patients will be imaged with ECG gating and breath holding in a supine position. Patients will be imaged at baseline and after 4 months of the intervention.
4 months
Change in right ventricular ejection fraction
Time Frame: 4 months
Right Ventricular ejection fraction (%) will be determined by cardiac magnetic resonance using a previously described cine steady-state free precession imaging. All patients will be imaged with ECG gating and breath holding in a supine position. Patients will be imaged at baseline and after 4 months of the intervention.
4 months
Change in left ventricular mass (absolute/index)
Time Frame: 4 months
Left ventricular mass absolute (g) and index (g/m2) will be determined by cardiac magnetic resonance using a previously described cine steady-state free precession imaging. All patients will be imaged with ECG gating and breath holding in a supine position. Patients will be imaged at baseline and after 4 months of the intervention.
4 months
Change in left ventricular diastolic volume (absolute/index)
Time Frame: 4 months
Left ventricular diastolic volume absolute (ml) and index (ml/m2) will be determined by cardiac magnetic resonance using a previously described cine steady-state free precession imaging. All patients will be imaged with ECG gating and breath holding in a supine position. Patients will be imaged at baseline and after 4 months of the intervention.
4 months
Change in right ventricular diastolic volume (absolute/index)
Time Frame: 4 months
Right ventricular diastolic volume absolute (ml) and index (ml/m2) will be determined by cardiac magnetic resonance using a previously described cine steady-state free precession imaging. All patients will be imaged with ECG gating and breath holding in a supine position. Patients will be imaged at baseline and after 4 months of the intervention.
4 months
Change in left ventricular systolic volume (absolute/index)
Time Frame: 4 months
Left ventricular systolic volume absolute (ml) and index (ml/m2) will be determined by cardiac magnetic resonance using a previously described cine steady-state free precession imaging. All patients will be imaged with ECG gating and breath holding in a supine position. Patients will be imaged at baseline and after 4 months of the intervention.
4 months
Change in right ventricular systolic volume (absolute/index)
Time Frame: 4 months
Right ventricular systolic volume absolute (ml) and index (ml/m2) will be determined by cardiac magnetic resonance using a previously described cine steady-state free precession imaging. All patients will be imaged with ECG gating and breath holding in a supine position. Patients will be imaged at baseline and after 4 months of the intervention.
4 months
Change in left ventricular stroke volume (absolute/index)
Time Frame: 4 months
Left ventricular stroke volume absolute (ml) and index (ml/m2) will be determined by cardiac magnetic resonance using a previously described cine steady-state free precession imaging. All patients will be imaged with ECG gating and breath holding in a supine position. Patients will be imaged at baseline and after 4 months of the intervention.
4 months
Change in right ventricular stroke volume (absolute/index)
Time Frame: 4 months
Right ventricular stroke volume (absolute (ml) and index (ml/m2) will be determined by cardiac magnetic resonance using a previously described cine steady-state free precession imaging. All patients will be imaged with ECG gating and breath holding in a supine position. Patients will be imaged at baseline and after 4 months of the intervention.
4 months
Change in late gadolinium enhancement
Time Frame: 4 months
Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) will be determined by cardiac magnetic resonance using a previously describe inversion recovery sequence after 10-15 minutes of a cumulative dose of 0,2 mmol/kg of gadolinium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid. All patients will be imaged with ECG gating and breath holding in a supine position. Patients will be imaged at baseline and after 4 months of the intervention.
4 months
Change in LV mass/volume ratio
Time Frame: 4 months
LV mass/volume ratio (g/mL) will be determined by cardiac magnetic resonance using a previously described cine steady-state free precession imaging. All patients will be imaged with ECG gating and breath holding in a supine position. Patients will be imaged at baseline and after 4 months of the intervention.
4 months
Change in functional capacity
Time Frame: 4 months
VO2max will be evaluated by cardiopulmonary test. Patients will performed the cardiopulmonary test at baseline and after 4 months of the intervention.
4 months
Change in quality of life
Time Frame: 4 months

Quality of life will be evaluated by numerical score of Minnesota Questionnaire.

Patients will performed the Minnesota Questionnaire at baseline and after 4 months of the intervention.
4 months
Change in N-Terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)
Time Frame: 4 months
Change in NT-proBNP with the intervention.
4 months
Change in diastolic dysfunction assessed by transthoracic echocardiogram
Time Frame: 4 months
Change in parameters of diastolic dysfunction assessed before and after the intervention.
4 months
Change in cardiac sympathetic function
Time Frame: 4 months
Change in cardiac sympathetic function assessed by cardiac uptake of metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) labeled with I-123. Patients will performed the MIBG study at baseline and after 4 months of the intervention.
4 months
Change in intracellular lifetime of water (τic - a marker of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy)
Time Frame: 4 months
τic will be determined by cardiac magnetic resonance T1 measurements acquired before and after administration of gadolinium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (0,2mmol/kg), at 2 different time points (baseline and 4-moths after the intervention)
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Campinas, Brazil

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: OTAVIO R COELHO-FILHO, MD, MPH, PhD, University of Campinas, Brazil

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 25, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 20, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 5, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 3, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HF-CMR-53967215800005404
  • FAPESP 2015/15402-2 (Other Grant/Funding Number: São Paulo Research Foundation)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

No plan to Share individual participant data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Aerobic exercise in treadmill

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings