Social Decision-making (SOCIAL-DECISION)
Brain Mechanism of Social Decision-making
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bron, France, 69500
- CH le Vinatier
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- healthy human adult
- normal vision
Exclusion Criteria:
- depression
- potential addiction to alcohol/ nicotine
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: neural mechanisms of decision making
Previous studies on how brain manages a value-based decision have been bounded to individual decisions.
The current study will extend the understanding of social dimensions by answering four questions.
|
The aim of this study is to investigate how an agent learns another's value preference when they should make decisions on behalf of another.
This experiment consists of 3 parts(i) measuring individual's loss aversion; (ii) feedback based learning of another's value preference; (iii) and decisions on behalf of others.
how individuals evaluate the risk and the outcome when they should make a single agreement decision in a group that will influence every member's payoff regardless of individuals' decisions.
For the first part of the experiment, we will measure the individual level of loss aversion which will be used as the parameter for controlling individual differences.
Human is decimated with other species by delegation of one responsibility.
Although the person who has no-interests with the outcome of decision, they should make a delegated decision.
Therefore, this decision has influences on others who are not part of the group.
The third party punishment (Juries decision making) is one example of the decision made by a group influencing the out group members.
For neuroimaging passes, the expected duration of each of the experimental protocols is about 1h30 for tasks 1 and 2 and about 2h for task 3. The maximum period foreseen for neuroimaging tests is 3 years and will start as soon as possible.
Completion of the behavioral tests.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Brain activation associated with decision-making (fMRI, non-invasive measure)
Time Frame: Day 1
|
1 hour in a fMRI scanner
|
Day 1
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Caroline DEMILY, MD, CH le Vinatier
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 69HCL16_0679
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.