A Study of INCB018424 Phosphate Cream in Subjects With Vitiligo

October 25, 2022 updated by: Incyte Corporation

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Dose-Ranging Study of INCB018424 Phosphate Cream in Subjects With Vitiligo

The purpose of this study will be to examine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ruxolitinib cream in subjects with vitiligo.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
157

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM (UAB), 1802 6th Ave S
    • Arkansas
      • Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States, 71913
        • BURKE PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH LLC, 3633 Central Ave
      • Rogers, Arkansas, United States, 72758
        • NORTHWEST AR CLINICAL TRIALS CENTER, PLLC/HULL DERMATOLOGY, PA, 500 S 52nd Street
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90036
        • THE VITILIGO & PIGMENTATION INSTITUE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, 5670 Wilshire Boulevard
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90045
        • DERMATOLOGY RESEARCH ASSOCIATES- LOS ANGELES, 8930 S Sepulveda Blvd
      • Oceanside, California, United States, 92056
        • DERMATOLOGY SPECIALISTS, 3629 Vista Way
    • Connecticut
      • Danbury, Connecticut, United States, 06810
        • CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTER OF CT, 27 Hospital Avenue
    • Florida
      • Ormond Beach, Florida, United States, 32174
        • LEAVITT MEDICAL ASSOCIATES OF FLORIDA INC/ AMERIDERM RESEARCH, 725 W Granada Blvd
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • EMORY UNIVERSITY, 1525 Clifton Road
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY, 676 N Saint Clair
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46256
        • DAWES FRETZIN CLINICAL RESEARCH GROUP, 8103 Clearvista Parkway
      • New Albany, Indiana, United States, 47150
        • DS RESEARCH, 2241 Green Valley Road
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
        • TULANE UNIVERSITY, 1415 Tulane Avenue
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
        • Tufts Medical Center, 260 Tremont Street
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01605
        • UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUESETTS, 364 Plantation Street
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48059
        • HAMZAVI DERMATOLOGY, 3031 W Grand Blvd
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63141
        • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE DERMATOLOGY, 969 N. Mason Road
    • New Hampshire
      • Portsmouth, New Hampshire, United States, 03801
        • ACTIVMED PRACTICES & RESEARCH, INC, 110 Corporate Drive
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 11209
        • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER- DERMATOLOGY ASSOCIATES, 5 E 98th Street
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES, Medical Center Boulevard
    • Oklahoma
      • Norman, Oklahoma, United States, 73071
        • CENTRAL SOONER RESEARCH, 900 N Porter Ave
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903
        • RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL, 593 Eddy Street
    • Texas
      • Arlington, Texas, United States, 76011
        • ARLINGTON RESEARCH CENTER, INC., 711 East Lamar Boulevard
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
        • MENTER DERMATOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE, 3900 Junius Street
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER, DEPARTMENT OF DERMATOLOGY, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • THE DERMATOLOGY AND LASER CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO, 7810 Louis Pasteur

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of vitiligo.

  • Vitiligo with depigmented areas including:

    • at least 0.5% of the total body surface area (BSA) on the face (0.5% BSA is approximately equal to the area of the participant's palm [without digits]) AND
    • at least 3% of the total BSA on nonfacial areas (3% BSA is approximately equal to the area of 3 of the participant's handprints [palm plus 5 digits]).
  • Participants who agree to discontinue all agents used to treat vitiligo from screening through the final follow-up visit. Over-the-counter preparations deemed acceptable by the investigator and camouflage makeups are permitted.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Conditions at baseline that would interfere with evaluation of vitiligo.
  • Participants who are receiving any kind of phototherapy, including tanning beds.
  • Participants with other dermatologic disease besides vitiligo whose presence or treatments could complicate the assessment of repigmentation.
  • Participants who have used skin bleaching treatments for past treatment of vitiligo or other pigmented areas.

  • Participants who have received any of the following treatments within the minimum specified timeframes.

    • Use of any biologic, investigational, or experimental therapy or procedure for vitiligo within 12 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) of screening.
    • Use of laser or light-based vitiligo treatments, including tanning beds, within 8 weeks of screening.
    • Use of immunomodulating oral or systemic medications (eg, corticosteroids, methotrexate, cyclosporine) or topical treatments that may affect vitiligo (eg, corticosteroids, tacrolimus/pimecrolimus, retinoids) within 4 weeks of screening.
  • Use of any prior and concomitant therapy not listed above that may interfere with the objective of the study as per discretion of the investigator, including drugs that cause photosensitivity or skin pigmentation (eg, antibiotics such as tetracyclines, antifungals) within 8 weeks of screening.
  • Participants with a clinically significant abnormal thyroid-stimulating hormone or free T4 at screening.
  • Participants with protocol-defined cytopenias at screening
  • Participants with severely impaired liver function.
  • Participants with impaired renal function.
  • Participants taking potent systemic cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors or fluconazole within 2 weeks or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, before the baseline visit.
  • Participants who have previously received JAK inhibitor therapy, systemic or topical.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% twice daily (BID)
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks, followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension.
Drug: Ruxolitinib cream
Ruxolitinib cream is a topical formulation applied as a thin film to affected areas.
Other Names:
  • INCB018424 cream
Experimental: Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% once daily (QD)
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks, followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension.
Drug: Ruxolitinib cream
Ruxolitinib cream is a topical formulation applied as a thin film to affected areas.
Other Names:
  • INCB018424 cream
Drug: Vehicle cream
Vehicle cream is matching in appearance to ruxolitinib cream and is to be applied in the same manner as ruxolitinib cream.
Experimental: Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks, followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension.
Drug: Ruxolitinib cream
Ruxolitinib cream is a topical formulation applied as a thin film to affected areas.
Other Names:
  • INCB018424 cream
Drug: Vehicle cream
Vehicle cream is matching in appearance to ruxolitinib cream and is to be applied in the same manner as ruxolitinib cream.
Experimental: Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (opportunity for re-randomization to a higher dose at Week 24 if < 25% improvement in F-VASI score), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension.
Drug: Ruxolitinib cream
Ruxolitinib cream is a topical formulation applied as a thin film to affected areas.
Other Names:
  • INCB018424 cream
Drug: Vehicle cream
Vehicle cream is matching in appearance to ruxolitinib cream and is to be applied in the same manner as ruxolitinib cream.
Placebo Comparator: Vehicle BID
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks, followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% QD, or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52, followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension.
Drug: Ruxolitinib cream
Ruxolitinib cream is a topical formulation applied as a thin film to affected areas.
Other Names:
  • INCB018424 cream
Drug: Vehicle cream
Vehicle cream is matching in appearance to ruxolitinib cream and is to be applied in the same manner as ruxolitinib cream.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Treated With Ruxolitinib Cream Who Achieved a ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Facial Assessment of the Vitiligo Area and Severity Index Score (F-VASI50) Compared With Participants Treated With Vehicle at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
An F-VASI50 responder achieved at least 50% improvement from Baseline in F-VASI, measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of body surface area [BSA]) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
Baseline; Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Facial Assessment of the Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PhGVA) of Clear or Almost Clear
Time Frame: Week 24
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include < 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus > 30% hair whitening.
Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Full Body Assessment of Vitiligo Area and Severity Index (T-VASI) at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 52
T-VASI was measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement from all body regions (percentage of BSA; assessed by the Investigator) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was derived by multiplying the vitiligo involvement values by the percentage of affected skin for each body site and summing all values (possible range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
Baseline; Week 52
Dose Response on Percentage Change From Baseline in F-VASI
Time Frame: up to 156 weeks
up to 156 weeks
Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE up to Week 24
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related, that occurred after a participant provided informed consent. A TEAE was an AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 Grades 1 through 4. Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.
up to 24 weeks
Number of Participants With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE up to Week 52
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related, that occurred after a participant provided informed consent. A TEAE was an AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using CTCAE v4.03 Grades 1 through 4. Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.
up to 52 weeks
Number of Participants With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE From Week 24 to Week 52
Time Frame: Week 24 to Week 52
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related, that occurred after a participant provided informed consent. A TEAE was an AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using CTCAE v4.03 Grades 1 through 4. Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.
Week 24 to Week 52
Number of Participants Who Applied Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID Throughout Study Participation With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE
Time Frame: up to Week 156
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related, that occurred after a participant provided informed consent. A TEAE was an AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using CTCAE v4.03 Grades 1 through 4. Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.
up to Week 156
Number of Participants With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE From Week 52 to Week 156
Time Frame: Week 52 to Week 156
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related, that occurred after a participant provided informed consent. A TEAE was an AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using CTCAE v4.03 Grades 1 through 4. Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.
Week 52 to Week 156
Mean Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
F-VASI was measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Baseline; Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156
F-VASI was measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
F-VASI was measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Percentage change = ([post-Baseline value minus Baseline value]/Baseline value) X 100.
Baseline; Week 24
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156
F-VASI was measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Percentage change = ([post-Baseline value minus Baseline value]/Baseline value) X 100.
Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an F-VASI50 at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156
An F-VASI50 responder achieved at least 50% improvement from Baseline in F-VASI, measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-BSA Repigmentation at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
F-BSA involvement was the proportion of the facial body surface area with vitiligo. The area "Face" was defined as including the area on the forehead to the original hairline, on the cheek to the jawline vertically and laterally from the corner of the mouth to the tragus. The area "Face" did not include the surface area of the lips, scalp, ears, or neck, but included the nose and eyelids. Body surface area assessment was performed by the Palmar Method. Body surface area was estimated to the nearest 0.1%. The approximate size of the participant's entire palmar surface (i.e., the palm plus 5 digits) was considered as 1% BSA, and the approximate size of the participant's thumb was considered as 0.1% BSA. Percentage change = ([post-Baseline value minus Baseline value]/Baseline value) X 100.
Baseline; Week 24
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-BSA Repigmentation at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156
F-BSA involvement was the proportion of the facial body surface area with vitiligo. The area "Face" was defined as including the area on the forehead to the original hairline, on the cheek to the jawline vertically and laterally from the corner of the mouth to the tragus. The area "Face" did not include the surface area of the lips, scalp, ears, or neck, but included the nose and eyelids. Body surface area assessment was performed by the Palmar Method. Body surface area was estimated to the nearest 0.1%. The approximate size of the participant's entire palmar surface (i.e., the palm plus 5 digits) was considered as 1% BSA, and the approximate size of the participant's thumb was considered as 0.1% BSA. Percentage change = ([post-Baseline value minus Baseline value]/Baseline value) X 100.
Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-BSA Repigmentation at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
T-BSA involvement was the proportion of the body surface area with vitiligo. Body surface area assessment was performed by the Palmar Method. Body surface area was estimated to the nearest 0.1%. The approximate size of the participant's entire palmar surface (i.e., the palm plus 5 digits) was considered as 1% BSA, and the approximate size of the participant's thumb was considered as 0.1% BSA. Percentage change = ([post-Baseline value minus Baseline value]/Baseline value) X 100.
Baseline; Week 24
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-BSA Repigmentation at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156
T-BSA involvement was the proportion of the body surface area with vitiligo. Body surface area assessment was performed by the Palmar Method. Body surface area was estimated to the nearest 0.1%. The approximate size of the participant's entire palmar surface (i.e., the palm plus 5 digits) was considered as 1% BSA, and the approximate size of the participant's thumb was considered as 0.1% BSA. Percentage change = ([post-Baseline value minus Baseline value]/Baseline value) X 100.
Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Mean Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
T-VASI was calculated with contributions from 6 sites. The percentage of vitiligo involvement was estimated in hand units (percentage of BSA estimated to nearest 0.1%) by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate percent BSA vitiligo involvement. The degree of depigmentation for each site was estimated to the nearest percentage: 0% (no depigmentation present), 10% (only specks of depigmentation present), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site and summing the values (range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Change from Baseline (BL) was calculated as the post-BL value minus the BL value.
Baseline; Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156
T-VASI was calculated with contributions from 6 sites. The percentage of vitiligo involvement was estimated in hand units (percentage of BSA estimated to nearest 0.1%) by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate percent BSA vitiligo involvement. The degree of depigmentation for each site was estimated to the nearest percentage: 0% (no depigmentation present), 10% (only specks of depigmentation present), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site and summing the values (range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Change from BL was calculated as the post-BL value minus the BL value.
Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
T-VASI was calculated with contributions from 6 sites. The percentage of vitiligo involvement was estimated in hand units (percentage of BSA estimated to nearest 0.1%) by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate percent BSA vitiligo involvement. The degree of depigmentation for each site was estimated to the nearest percentage: 0% (no depigmentation present), 10% (only specks of depigmentation present), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site and summing the values (range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
Baseline; Week 24
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156
T-VASI was calculated with contributions from 6 sites. The percentage of vitiligo involvement was estimated in hand units (percentage of BSA estimated to nearest 0.1%) by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate percent BSA vitiligo involvement. The degree of depigmentation for each site was estimated to the nearest percentage: 0% (no depigmentation present), 10% (only specks of depigmentation present), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site and summing the values (range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Mean Change From Baseline in Vitiligo European Task Force (VETF) Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Spreading
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).
Baseline; Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Spreading
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 52 and 104
The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).
Baseline; Weeks 52 and 104
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Percentage Area
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).
Baseline; Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Percentage Area
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 52 and 104
The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).
Baseline; Weeks 52 and 104
Percentage Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Percentage Area
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).
Baseline; Week 24
Percentage Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Percentage Area
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 52 and 104
The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).
Baseline; Weeks 52 and 104
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Staging
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).
Baseline; Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Staging
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 52 and 104
The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).
Baseline; Weeks 52 and 104
Percentage Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Staging
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).
Baseline; Week 24
Percentage Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Staging
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 52 and 104
The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).
Baseline; Weeks 52 and 104
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include < 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus > 30% hair whitening.
Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Time Frame: Weeks 52, 104, and 156
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include < 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus > 30% hair whitening.
Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include < 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus > 30% hair whitening.
Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Time Frame: Weeks 52, 104, and 156
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include < 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus > 30% hair whitening.
Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Patient's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the participant using the PaGVA, which has a 5-point scale. The participant was asked the following: How severe is your vitiligo on your face (or total body) with respect to the area covered by white skin? Responses: 0=no white patches (no vitiligo); 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe; 4=very severe.
Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Time Frame: Weeks 52, 104, and 156
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the participant using the PaGVA, which has a 5-point scale. The participant was asked the following: How severe is your vitiligo on your face (or total body) with respect to the area covered by white skin? Responses: 0=no white patches (no vitiligo); 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe; 4=very severe.
Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the participant using the PaGVA, which has a 5-point scale. The participant was asked the following: How severe is your vitiligo on your face (or total body) with respect to the area covered by white skin? Responses: 0=no white patches (no vitiligo); 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe; 4=very severe.
Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Time Frame: Weeks 52, 104, and 156
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the participant using the PaGVA, which has a 5-point scale. The participant was asked the following: How severe is your vitiligo on your face (or total body) with respect to the area covered by white skin? Responses: 0=no white patches (no vitiligo); 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe; 4=very severe.
Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Impression of Change for Vitiligo (PaGIC-V) Category at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
The PaGIC-V is an assessment of improvement by the participant. It is a 7-point scale comparing the vitiligo areas at Baseline with the participant's treated areas of vitiligo at the study visit. The participant answered the following: "Since the start of the treatment you've received in this study, your vitiligo in areas treated with the study drug is: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; and 7, very much worse.
Baseline; Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156
The PaGIC-V is an assessment of improvement by the participant. It is a 7-point scale comparing the vitiligo areas at Baseline with the participant's treated areas of vitiligo at the study visit. The participant answered the following: "Since the start of the treatment you've received in this study, your vitiligo in areas treated with the study drug is: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; and 7, very much worse.
Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Percentage of Participants Who Report a PaGIC-V Score of Very Much Improved or Much Improved at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
The PaGIC-V is an assessment of improvement by the participant. It is a 7-point scale comparing the vitiligo areas at Baseline with the participant's treated areas of vitiligo at the study visit. The participant answered the following: "Since the start of the treatment you've received in this study, your vitiligo in areas treated with the study drug is: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; and 7, very much worse.
Baseline; Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Report a PaGIC-V Score of Very Much Improved or Much Improved at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156
The PaGIC-V is an assessment of improvement by the participant. It is a 7-point scale comparing the vitiligo areas at Baseline with the participant's treated areas of vitiligo at the study visit. The participant answered the following: "Since the start of the treatment you've received in this study, your vitiligo in areas treated with the study drug is: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; and 7, very much worse.
Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Time to Achieve an F-VASI50: Number of Days From the Date of the First Application in the Double-Blind Period to the Date of the First Evaluation at Which the Participant Met the F-VASI50 Score
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
An F-VASI50 responder achieved at least 50% improvement from Baseline in F-VASI, measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
up to 52 weeks
Time to Achieve a T-VASI50: Number of Days From the Date of the First Application in the Double-Blind Period to the Date of the First Evaluation at Which the Participant Met the T-VASI50 Score
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
A T-VASI50 responder achieved at least 50% improvement from Baseline in T-VASI. T-VASI was measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement from all body regions (percentage of BSA; assessed by the Investigator) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was derived by multiplying the vitiligo involvement values by the percentage of affected skin for each body site and summing all values (possible range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
up to 52 weeks
Time to Achieve an F-PhGVA of Clear or Almost Clear
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include < 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus > 30% hair whitening. Time to achieve an F-PhGVA response was defined as the number of days from the date of the first application in the Double-Blind Period to the date of the first evaluation at which the participant met the F-PhGVA score.
up to 52 weeks
Time to Achieve an T-PhGVA of Clear or Almost Clear
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include < 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus > 30% hair whitening. Time to achieve a T-PhGVA response was defined as the number of days from the date of the first application in the Double-Blind Period to the date of the first evaluation at which the participant met the T-PhGVA score.
up to 52 weeks
Time to Achieve a PaGIC-V of Very Much Improved or Much Improved
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
The PaGIC-V is an assessment of improvement by the participant. It is a 7-point scale comparing the vitiligo areas at Baseline with the participant's treated areas of vitiligo at the study visit. The participant answered the following: "Since the start of the treatment you've received in this study, your vitiligo in areas treated with the study drug is: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; and 7, very much worse. Time to achieve a PaGIC-V response was defined as the number of days from the date of the first application in the Double-Blind Period to the date of the first evaluation at which the participant met the PaGIC-V score.
up to 52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Incyte Corporation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 7, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 12, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 8, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 28, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 17, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 25, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • INCB 18424-211

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vitiligo

Clinical Trials on Ruxolitinib cream

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings