Pre-treatment Factors for the Development of Chronic Pain in Low Back Pain Patients

May 9, 2019 updated by: Kristian Kjær Petersen, Aalborg University
The purpose of the project is to associate pre-treatment pain sensitivity level, levels of pain catastrophizing and levels of The Subgroups for Targeted Treatment (STarT) Back Screening Tool in patients with acute low back pain and patients' progression after 12 weeks of treatment by general practitioners.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
58

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Denmark
    • Aalborg East
      • Aalborg, Aalborg East, Denmark, 9220
        • Lægerne Sløjfen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The subjects will be recruited through general practitioners in The North Denmark Region. When a patient with low back pain reports to his/her general practitioner, the doctor will present the project to the patient, and in case the patient shows interest, the doctor asks him/her to contact the contact person of the study. Thus, the recruitment does not take place through advertisements, but through the normal patient flow in the general practice.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with low back pain, who have a mobile phone.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Drug addiction defined as the use of cannabis, opioids or other drugs
  • Alcohol addiction
  • Lack of ability to cooperate
  • Surgery to the spine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, RMDQ
Time Frame: 12 weeks follow-up
Change in the Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMDQ) is one of the most widely used questionnaires for back pain. The RMDQ is a self-administered disability questionnaire consisting of 24 questions. The questions are related specifically to physical functions likely to be affected by low back pain. Each item is qualified with the phrase "because of my back pain" to distinguish back pain disability from disability due to other causes. When completing the RMDQ, the respondents are asked to tick a statement if it applies to them on that particular day.
12 weeks follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The StarT Back Screening Tool
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks follow-up
The The StarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) is a nine-item patient self-reporting questionnaire validated for triage of nonspecific low back pain patients in primary care.
Baseline, 12 weeks follow-up
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks follow-up
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) consists of 13 items focusing on thoughts and feelings in connection with pain.
Baseline, 12 weeks follow-up
Predicting the Inception of Chronic Pain
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks follow-up
The Predicting the Inception of Chronic Pain (PICKUP) questionnaire focuses on pain ("How much low back pain have you had during the past week?", 1 = none, 2 = very mild, 3 = mild, 4 = moderate, 5 = severe, 6 = very severe), radiating pain to the legs ("Do you have leg pain?" 0 = no, 1 = yes), compensability ("Is your back pain compensable, e.g. through worker's compensation or third party insurance?" 0 = no, 1 = yes), depression ("How much have you been bothered by feeling depressed in the past week (0-10 scale)?" 0 = not at all, 10 = extremely) and the subject's overall evaluation of the risk of chronic pain ("In your view, how large is the risk that your current pain may become persistent (0-10 scale)?" 0 = none, 10 = extreme).
Baseline, 12 weeks follow-up
Basic information
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks follow-up
A general questionnaire has been created for this study to gain a basic understanding of the patient's current pain, demographic information and use of medication
Baseline, 12 weeks follow-up
Assessment of the Pain Area
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks follow-up
Patients will be asked to draw the pain area of their low back pain on a body map.
Baseline, 12 weeks follow-up
Cuff Algometry
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks follow-up
Cuff algometry will be applied to assess pressure pain thresholds, temporal summation of pain and conditioned pain modulation.
Baseline, 12 weeks follow-up
Handheld Algometry
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks follow-up
Handheld algometry will be applied to assess pressure pain thresholds.
Baseline, 12 weeks follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Aalborg University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Research Unit of General Practice, Aalborg

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Martin B Jensen, MD, PhD, Research Unit for General Practice in Aalborg, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 3, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 6, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 6, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 31, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 9, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • N-20160086

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Standard care initiated by the general practitioner

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings